Active Users:539 Time:24/11/2024 02:05:21 PM
Oh i know it's not a complete solution and i have no problem with a fence LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 16/08/2010 07:43:26 PM
but so many people just focus on the border itself and worry about building a big enough/good enough fence and patrolling it constantly in its entirety. So few people focus on the bigger issues in regards to illegal immigration that can proactively decrease it, such as process reform and drug reform.

Just for some rough numbers, I have a friend (a wotmaniac-friend) who's husband is from Australia. Our good old friend Australia, yes? To come to the States, he had to wait a full year and pay thousands of dollars. He yearly has to pay a good chunk of money (I believe it's around 1k dollars) to stay on his particular visa/green card. This is exacerbated a bit, as they are not pursuing citizenship (When she finishes school, they plan to move back to Aus).

My main point in this is that it requires a great deal of time and money to come to the US legally, even for someone from a country like Australia, and who is working in a relatively desired field (he's a techie). Is it really a surprise that impoverished Mexicans without a hope in their own country look at the finances and time required for proper immigration, and choose to chance a border jump instead? This isn't to say we should just let them all in or not remove them, but people in desperate circumstances will find away around a fence. An entire shark-infested sea doesn't stop the Cubans.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
At what point does it become ok to take over a country? - 16/08/2010 04:25:09 PM 1230 Views
why would we want to make Mexico our problem? *NM* - 16/08/2010 04:30:48 PM 330 Views
Well, generally it's no longer seen as acceptable. - 16/08/2010 04:38:11 PM 864 Views
RevoluciĆ³n! *NM* - 16/08/2010 04:47:55 PM 303 Views
When it spills your pint and eyes up your woman? - 16/08/2010 04:53:29 PM 744 Views
When they get on your nerves or have something you want, preferably both - 16/08/2010 05:04:10 PM 763 Views
I agree we should attack Canada instead - 16/08/2010 05:19:48 PM 757 Views
I would legalize drugs ten times over before I would annex Mexico. - 16/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 831 Views
that sounds like a much better immigration solution idea than "let's build a GIGANTIC FENCE!!!" *NM* - 16/08/2010 06:33:46 PM 313 Views
Lol that rates right up there with the bridge to nowhere *NM* - 16/08/2010 06:49:19 PM 324 Views
Work Visas might help, but... - 16/08/2010 06:51:11 PM 949 Views
Oh i know it's not a complete solution and i have no problem with a fence - 16/08/2010 07:43:26 PM 696 Views
Just so long as we're both on the 'multi-front solution' page - 16/08/2010 08:35:06 PM 610 Views
it's also worth noting that no one is proposing throwing out the Cubans - 16/08/2010 08:54:46 PM 758 Views
west point? *NM* - 16/08/2010 08:56:58 PM 273 Views
Well take over and intervene are two totally different things - 16/08/2010 09:00:50 PM 949 Views
never *NM* - 16/08/2010 09:05:03 PM 309 Views
Not even Hitler's Germany? (if he never went to war but just stayed put) Reply to Yuna *NM* - 16/08/2010 09:24:41 PM 401 Views
If he had never gone to war, that would also have meant no Holocaust... *NM* - 16/08/2010 09:28:16 PM 304 Views
Dachau opened in '33, Nuremburg Laws were '35 - 16/08/2010 09:36:59 PM 689 Views
Ok that's what I was thinking - 16/08/2010 09:45:51 PM 697 Views
Uh, yeah, see, there's a difference between "blaming" and "exterminating". - 16/08/2010 09:52:37 PM 733 Views
Re: Uh, yeah, see, there's a difference between "blaming" and "exterminating". - 16/08/2010 09:54:29 PM 662 Views
I don't know if there's really anything to specifically compare it to... - 16/08/2010 10:00:59 PM 832 Views
Also, perhaps someone should just invoke the (variation of the) Godwin Law and stop this whole thing - 16/08/2010 10:02:23 PM 740 Views
Ah, - 16/08/2010 10:04:39 PM 645 Views
I second the motion to invoke Godwin's Law for closure... - 16/08/2010 10:11:22 PM 782 Views
Perhaps - 16/08/2010 09:46:55 PM 646 Views
Well, you'll note I didn't make that causal relation you attribute to me. - 16/08/2010 09:55:39 PM 774 Views
The Dachau follow up was bookkeeping - 16/08/2010 10:05:35 PM 724 Views
The US already took half of Mexico, so why not the other half? - 16/08/2010 09:57:56 PM 771 Views
"Took" is an unfriendly word, we purchased it *NM* - 16/08/2010 10:21:58 PM 311 Views
yes after a messy political and physical "conflict" - 16/08/2010 10:53:22 PM 744 Views
There was also the Gasdsen Purchase - 17/08/2010 12:30:21 AM 686 Views
The Gadsden Purchase was a pittance and an afterthought, as I'm sure you're aware. - 18/08/2010 12:36:24 PM 606 Views
It is fairly large, but yes - 18/08/2010 02:21:25 PM 683 Views
Well, yes, it WAS a purchase, but then, it would be. - 18/08/2010 03:22:23 PM 1123 Views
and why did it belong to Mexico to begin with? *NM* - 17/08/2010 01:28:28 AM 343 Views
same way it seems to be the way most people who own the Americas came to own it. - 17/08/2010 01:46:49 AM 563 Views
At least we took the time to conquer it - 18/08/2010 05:20:57 PM 883 Views
well they were not using it *NM* - 17/08/2010 01:27:47 AM 288 Views
Once you solved all your own problems, I'm sure. *NM* - 16/08/2010 10:58:28 PM 302 Views
We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels. - 17/08/2010 12:58:37 AM 584 Views
Re: We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels. - 17/08/2010 02:39:11 AM 654 Views
Re: We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels. - 17/08/2010 03:34:59 AM 817 Views
I think maybe we've had enough of nation building for a while *NM* - 17/08/2010 02:45:22 AM 293 Views

Reply to Message