You are the one who refuses to accept that churches might wrongfully discriminate at all.
Because it's not possible under law. Law leaves private institutions free to do what they will, so long as what they do does not hurt people or their property. I'm not sure why you find that so difficut to accept, since everyone has pointed out to you that it is so, and Americans who know Constitutional matters have given you citations.
The real question here is not what churches ought to believe (frankly, I don't care) but what they ought to be allowed to do. I believe that banning gay marriage is discrimination. I believe this because sins are accepted in other parts of christianity and even embraced as something to be dealt with before god.
What they believe and what they do is inextricably linked. Churches do not do what they don't believe, and nor should they have to. Sins are not accepted. We acknowledge people commit sins, but we require that they try not to. Because we're not perfect, we continue to sin, but then we have to repent and ask for forgiveness.
What churches do you think are happy for people to continue sinning? That's another thing you refuse to answer.
Some, not all, churches do pass out condoms to young people, in the hopes that they will avoid pregnancy out of wedlock. Is this not a form of sanctioning premarital sex? At least, in the same sense that gay marriage would be?
Not all churches think pre-marital sex is wrong. You seem to think that the Christian religion is monolithic. It's very much not.
Some, not all, churches allow divorce. Does this not diminish wedding vows? Which are to be eternal before god. Is this not a form of sanctioning a sin?
Again, those churches that sanction divorce do not consider it to be a sin. Christianity is not monolithic.
If I'm grossly ignoring your points and refusing to listen, please enlighten me. But I would appreciate if you show me how my points are not valid.
I believe I just have.
And, please note that I have been referring to my church in my responses, not all churches. I know what I believe, what my church believes, and what that means we practice. That's what I can talk about. For the rest, I make assumptions. Well-grounded ones, mind you.
OK. First, private institutions cannot do whatever they want. The civil rights act outlines that discrimination based on race, gender, or ethnicity is illegal. Granted, sexual preference is not included there, the supreme court ruled that discrimination in private institutions is only permitted when the expressive message (or as I said, the essence of the church) of the institution is altered.
I understand that christianity is not monolithic, but I know for a fact that many churches claiming to take the bible literally engage in these practices. I can show you articles if you'd like. Not all churches as I said engage in these practices, but some do. And some of those churches do still believe that wedding vows are sacred, and premarital sex is a sin.
The difference is that they acknowledge that sin is a part of life. Something that we will continue to do, despite our best efforts. Now, maybe it's that we subconsciously don't try hard enough to alter our behavior or it REALLY is impossible to not sin, either way, people continue to sin and continue to ask forgiveness.
I recognize that there are some homosexuals who believe that what they are doing isn't wrong at all. Those would be the homosexuals who do not take the whole of the bible literally or those who think the volume of material in the bible dedicated to accepting outcasts and sinners outweighs the few lines condemning homosexuals. But I would also expect few of those homosexuals to want to be married in the church.
Some homosexuals, not an immense number, may want to marry under god. They may feel that what they are doing isn't the way god created things or how people were MEANT to be (note that I do NOT believe this in any way). So they still want to be married under the church, acknowledging that they may be sinning, but trying to be better people in spite of that. They may not be going about that in the best way. But not all of us go about reforming ourselves in the best ways possible either.
I see your points about the word of god saying homosexuality is a sin and that gay marriage is wrong. But the expressive message of christianity isn't altered in marrying two sinners that happen to be homosexual.
You must unlearn what you have learned.
Gay Marriage
12/08/2010 10:23:19 AM
- 1835 Views
I disagree on the latter part
12/08/2010 12:04:15 PM
- 1211 Views
I follow your point...
12/08/2010 12:14:17 PM
- 1193 Views
Suspect you would find plenty of denominations that would argue with you rather strenuously.
12/08/2010 12:24:55 PM
- 1190 Views
See, that's what I'm saying...
12/08/2010 07:37:26 PM
- 1153 Views
You didn't read my post.
12/08/2010 09:10:21 PM
- 1066 Views
Actually, you didn't read my post
12/08/2010 09:23:54 PM
- 1107 Views
Um, you're wrong.
12/08/2010 09:37:13 PM
- 1116 Views
Re: Um, you're wrong.
12/08/2010 09:44:17 PM
- 1074 Views
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale. And no, he described it accurately. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:53:31 PM
- 564 Views
You're still wrong.
12/08/2010 09:54:55 PM
- 1210 Views
Re: You're still wrong.
12/08/2010 09:58:26 PM
- 1066 Views
Again, you are still wrong.
12/08/2010 10:04:42 PM
- 1115 Views
Re: Again, you are still wrong.
12/08/2010 10:17:13 PM
- 964 Views
Wrong definition of "club"
12/08/2010 10:30:52 PM
- 1212 Views
Re: Wrong definition of "club"
12/08/2010 10:40:55 PM
- 1118 Views
Also
12/08/2010 10:02:44 PM
- 1161 Views
And wrong again.
12/08/2010 10:08:24 PM
- 1184 Views
Not so quick!
12/08/2010 10:21:31 PM
- 1020 Views
Yes, so quick!
12/08/2010 10:32:13 PM
- 967 Views
Let's be reasonable here
12/08/2010 10:41:53 PM
- 1078 Views
Why do you get to judge?
12/08/2010 10:48:57 PM
- 1105 Views
I don't
12/08/2010 10:53:21 PM
- 998 Views
OK.
12/08/2010 10:58:22 PM
- 1112 Views
Re: OK.
12/08/2010 11:03:50 PM
- 1042 Views
Here's the thing: your opinion seems to be informed by the Roman Catholic Faith.
12/08/2010 11:14:03 PM
- 1006 Views
Re: Here's the thing: your opinion seems to be informed by the Roman Catholic Faith.
12/08/2010 11:23:35 PM
- 1123 Views
Then please stop.
12/08/2010 11:01:05 PM
- 1081 Views
What's wrong with discussion?
12/08/2010 11:05:48 PM
- 1019 Views
Discussion? Nothing. Your assertions about other people's views, something.
12/08/2010 11:09:48 PM
- 1047 Views
What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay?
12/08/2010 10:12:54 PM
- 921 Views
Re: What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay?
12/08/2010 10:23:36 PM
- 1066 Views
Well then that brings us back to my question, which you have yet to answer.
12/08/2010 10:36:48 PM
- 1023 Views
Re: Well then that brings us back to my question, which you have yet to answer.
12/08/2010 10:46:22 PM
- 1138 Views
Not entirely true either... or, well, true as far as Brown goes.
12/08/2010 10:08:42 PM
- 1032 Views
Actually, I did. And since everyone else told you you're wrong about that I didn't see any need
12/08/2010 09:38:33 PM
- 1105 Views
Re: Actually, I did. And since everyone else told you you're wrong about that I didn't see any need
12/08/2010 09:55:05 PM
- 1039 Views
Gah.
12/08/2010 09:59:45 PM
- 989 Views
What a mature response.
12/08/2010 10:11:00 PM
- 1173 Views
I can't speak for Rebekah, but I don't think the issue is that your points are invalid per se.
12/08/2010 10:22:30 PM
- 1012 Views
Um
12/08/2010 09:46:43 PM
- 1139 Views
That's a very good question. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:49:05 PM
- 532 Views
It makes no sense
12/08/2010 04:29:24 PM
- 975 Views
Re: It makes no sense
12/08/2010 07:39:25 PM
- 1054 Views
Re: It makes no sense
12/08/2010 07:41:02 PM
- 1130 Views
Yes, but while marrying two murderers does not ensure that they will continue to murder...
12/08/2010 09:08:53 PM
- 970 Views
Re: Yes, but while marrying two murderers does not ensure that they will continue to murder...
12/08/2010 09:42:21 PM
- 1084 Views
What other church sanctioned circumstances encourage continued sin?
12/08/2010 09:45:33 PM
- 1138 Views
Re: What other church sanctioned circumstances encourage continued sin?
13/08/2010 11:04:02 AM
- 1074 Views
Wow, it's almost like an entire denomination believes that! *NM*
13/08/2010 03:41:07 PM
- 517 Views
13/08/2010 03:43:26 PM
- 879 Views
Yeah, that's the Roman Catholic basis against masturbation and contraception. *NM*
13/08/2010 04:12:00 PM
- 516 Views
Yes
13/08/2010 04:22:58 PM
- 927 Views
Dude....please at least have a working knowledge of the Bible before you spout off.
12/08/2010 10:47:13 PM
- 960 Views
secular marriage is decoupled from religious marriage
12/08/2010 02:50:43 PM
- 1151 Views
Simple, require the legal and religious marriage to be performed separately.
12/08/2010 02:58:43 PM
- 987 Views
And they are, in fact, separate right now in the US. They're just called the same thing.
12/08/2010 03:29:26 PM
- 1034 Views
It's not the same name that's confusing so much as the single ceremony. Or so it seems to me.
12/08/2010 03:37:20 PM
- 1044 Views
I disagree. I think giving the legal institution the same name as the sacrament is the problem.
12/08/2010 03:59:43 PM
- 1057 Views
What in the world would that accomplish?
12/08/2010 03:44:32 PM
- 1070 Views
Provide some much-needed clarity, evidently.
12/08/2010 03:49:33 PM
- 920 Views
the problem is it would be changing a centuries old tradition..
12/08/2010 04:26:47 PM
- 931 Views
heheheheheheheHAHAHAHEHEHehehehehahheeh*cough*
12/08/2010 04:55:09 PM
- 941 Views
thats OK I am sure you will get over it
12/08/2010 05:22:08 PM
- 976 Views
Just guessing, but I think it was the "centuries old tradition" that set off the giggle fit.
12/08/2010 07:25:38 PM
- 1099 Views
Really? I was hoping for something better
12/08/2010 10:06:00 PM
- 1031 Views
So government recognition makes your religion meaningful?
12/08/2010 10:11:54 PM
- 1117 Views
not my religion I'm agnostic
12/08/2010 10:34:40 PM
- 980 Views
I'm not far left, thank you very much. *NM*
12/08/2010 10:20:31 PM
- 588 Views
no but your are European and that slants your views *NM*
12/08/2010 10:36:01 PM
- 579 Views
Simples
12/08/2010 09:30:31 PM
- 1061 Views
there are about 140 post ranging from boyscouts to infant babtism
12/08/2010 10:57:46 PM
- 1059 Views
So.
14/08/2010 01:27:59 AM
- 898 Views
sorry I responded I forgot what a tool you are. my bad
14/08/2010 02:48:57 AM
- 1415 Views
You spout some utter gibberish then dish out insults when called on it? Very funny
15/08/2010 12:47:04 PM
- 1243 Views
Agreed *NM*
12/08/2010 03:45:04 PM
- 466 Views
I love you, Camilla
12/08/2010 04:02:15 PM
- 860 Views
Re: I love you, Camilla
12/08/2010 04:04:10 PM
- 1049 Views
A couple of things
12/08/2010 12:58:09 PM
- 1029 Views
there is major flaw in your argument
12/08/2010 03:31:45 PM
- 1165 Views
Re: there is major flaw in your argument
12/08/2010 04:01:32 PM
- 1050 Views
I should clarify that I support gay marriage
12/08/2010 05:20:36 PM
- 986 Views
One point about Prop. 8
12/08/2010 07:38:55 PM
- 1029 Views
I know that is the commonl;y held belief but I thinkit is wrong
12/08/2010 10:32:58 PM
- 951 Views
Religious institutions, though, pushed hard to pass it.
12/08/2010 10:42:33 PM
- 1037 Views
that doesn’t translate into people voting for religious reasons
12/08/2010 11:19:48 PM
- 858 Views
Bigotry and Fear that are supported and encouraged by religious institutions.
12/08/2010 11:32:30 PM
- 1018 Views
there are major flaws in your argument
12/08/2010 07:51:52 PM
- 1128 Views
Women can't be priests in the Catholic church.
12/08/2010 08:00:24 PM
- 809 Views
Forcing religious institutions to marry gay couples is hideously unconstitutional.
12/08/2010 04:18:59 PM
- 1076 Views
You are absolutely wrong
12/08/2010 07:57:19 PM
- 1072 Views
Your arguments are so specious and stupid I don't know where to begin.
13/08/2010 05:04:17 AM
- 991 Views
Why do people equate....
12/08/2010 07:11:15 PM
- 986 Views
Because "homophobic", like "xenophobic", has shifted a bit in meaning...
12/08/2010 07:33:56 PM
- 1068 Views
Because your reasons for being against gay marriage are so specious *NM*
12/08/2010 07:59:42 PM
- 596 Views
I particularly enjoy the implied assumption that your a good enough judge of my motivations. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:24:14 PM
- 563 Views
Re: Why do people equate....
12/08/2010 08:04:24 PM
- 1139 Views
+1
12/08/2010 08:06:19 PM
- 1177 Views
Stop with the pile on Camilla.
12/08/2010 09:22:35 PM
- 1105 Views
You would have said nothing if I had just said "agreed"
12/08/2010 09:27:33 PM
- 927 Views
Which speaks highly of you....
12/08/2010 09:36:30 PM
- 1106 Views
This is being very petty. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:41:26 PM
- 551 Views
As opposed to a snarky +1 comment? *NM*
12/08/2010 09:45:02 PM
- 570 Views
It's not snarky.
12/08/2010 09:47:47 PM
- 1043 Views
Its a +1 shorthand comment...
12/08/2010 09:52:04 PM
- 1332 Views
Wow. Those two characters allowed you to read Camilla's motivations?
12/08/2010 09:54:25 PM
- 959 Views
Re: Why do people equate....
12/08/2010 09:13:07 PM
- 1138 Views
you are exactly why the state needs to make a clear seperation between the secular and religious
12/08/2010 09:33:22 PM
- 1017 Views
Ok, so if the state does then...
12/08/2010 09:44:31 PM
- 957 Views
No, marriage started because of property.
12/08/2010 09:59:14 PM
- 1054 Views
So then two things come to mind...
12/08/2010 10:04:39 PM
- 1030 Views
Only two?
12/08/2010 10:27:08 PM
- 1028 Views
That's a little difficult to do
13/08/2010 03:19:32 PM
- 1188 Views
Re: That's a little difficult to do
13/08/2010 03:30:14 PM
- 1056 Views
yes but about half of the old testament deals with protecting those rights
13/08/2010 05:16:09 PM
- 1016 Views
The relationship between religion and rain go even farther back...
13/08/2010 06:15:32 PM
- 1003 Views
Actually, I agree with that
12/08/2010 10:01:37 PM
- 904 Views
See, what I don't get is why gay people care about
12/08/2010 08:18:45 PM
- 1013 Views
It's mostly about getting married in the eyes of the state.
12/08/2010 08:42:52 PM
- 1128 Views
I'm fairly sure Jonte was referring only to the "churches have to accept gay marriages" bit. *NM*
12/08/2010 08:44:52 PM
- 600 Views
Starting again
12/08/2010 08:23:08 PM
- 1100 Views
Not at all
12/08/2010 10:58:45 PM
- 1040 Views
Re: Not at all
13/08/2010 09:14:48 AM
- 836 Views
Agreed *NM*
13/08/2010 10:21:06 AM
- 435 Views
Oh dear
13/08/2010 10:30:45 AM
- 951 Views
I suppose you also think that religious Pacifists should be eligible for the draft?
12/08/2010 08:42:21 PM
- 1110 Views