Active Users:1268 Time:23/11/2024 06:48:19 AM
I imagine if the UK changes it will move to Proportional Representation Mark Send a noteboard - 07/05/2010 10:04:38 AM
With a Single Transferable Vote much like Ireland uses. This would involve multi-seat seat constituencies.

From wikipedia

This method of proportional representation uses a system of preferential voting to determine the results of the election

A constituency elects two or more representatives per electorate. Consequently the constituency is proportionally larger than a single member constituency. Parties tend to offer as many candidates as they most optimistically could expect to win: the major parties may nominate almost as many candidates as there are seats, while the minor parties and independents rather fewer. Voters mark their ballot, allocating preferences to their preferred ranking for some or all candidates. A successful candidate must achieve a quota, being the total number of votes received divided by the number of candidates to be elected plus one, plus one; i.e. in a nine member constituency the quota would be (the number of votes divided by 10) +1. Only in a few cases is this achieved at the first count. For the second count, if a candidate wins election her/his surplus vote (in excess of the quota) is transferred to her/his voters' second choices; otherwise, the least popular candidate is eliminated and her/his votes redistributed according to the second preference shown on them. If there are more than one candidate who can not get enough votes after the transfer of votes of least popular candidate, she or he will be eliminated too (as they could not avoid it on the next round under any circumstance).

This process continues for as many counts as are needed until all seats are filled either by the required number of candidates achieving a quota and being deemed to be elected or until there are only the number of candidates remaining as there are number of seats. Although the counting process is complicated, voting is clear and most voters get at least one of their preferences elected.

All deputies are answerable directly to their local constituents. Some political scientists argue that STV is more properly classified as 'semi-proportional' as there is no assurance of a proportional result at a nationwide level. Indeed, many advocates of STV would argue that preventing nationwide proportionality is one of the primary goals of the system, to avoid the perceived risks of a very highly fragmented legislature.


It's a far from perfect system and many here (including myself) would rather we move to a list system, but it is certainly an improvement over first past the post single seat constituencies.
Once known as Hochopepa

You cannot kill a vampire with an MDF stake; werewolves can't fly; zombies do not run. - Simon Pegg
Reply to message
Lib Dems: Up 1% of the vote, down 10% of the seats. - 07/05/2010 09:29:03 AM 1587 Views
Re: Lib Dems: Up 1% of the vote, down 10% of the seats. - 07/05/2010 09:45:23 AM 1027 Views
So what would you move to? - 07/05/2010 09:53:51 AM 899 Views
I imagine if the UK changes it will move to Proportional Representation - 07/05/2010 10:04:38 AM 971 Views
Re: So what would you move to? - 07/05/2010 02:55:32 PM 972 Views
God I hate the British system - 07/05/2010 10:24:35 AM 1004 Views
It's an excellent morning. Conservatives are at 301 right now. *NM* - 07/05/2010 01:57:52 PM 530 Views
Are you counting the Speaker? *NM* - 07/05/2010 01:59:37 PM 569 Views
Indeed - 07/05/2010 02:22:37 PM 1038 Views
I love how they're calling that option "The Coalition of the Losers". - 07/05/2010 02:27:56 PM 949 Views
They are? Where? - 07/05/2010 02:38:01 PM 1072 Views
On the lovely BBC. Paxman, Robinson, Dimbleby et al. - 07/05/2010 02:52:01 PM 968 Views
Ah, we have it on but with the sound turned down - the subtitlers must be skipping that phrase - 07/05/2010 03:13:57 PM 917 Views
The thing with PR is, the current vote results are a horrid predictor for PR vote results. - 07/05/2010 03:45:58 PM 960 Views
That is true - 07/05/2010 03:53:51 PM 978 Views
Re: That is true - 07/05/2010 03:54:51 PM 997 Views
I'm sure it would be a setup for new elections in a few months if they did. *NM* - 07/05/2010 02:40:49 PM 532 Views
I suspect we'll get one of those anyway. - 07/05/2010 02:52:32 PM 945 Views
What is the general consensus on who would win or lose from new elections? - 07/05/2010 02:57:04 PM 1096 Views
I've not heard any comment on this yet. I might have missed some. - 07/05/2010 02:58:00 PM 974 Views
Not being talked about yet - I'd guess whoever is PM will lose though - 07/05/2010 03:21:23 PM 1095 Views
Re: Not being talked about yet - I'd guess whoever is PM will lose though - 07/05/2010 03:29:37 PM 1082 Views
King William IV indeed. - 07/05/2010 03:37:18 PM 1036 Views
Re: King William IV indeed. - 07/05/2010 03:40:41 PM 925 Views
Re: Not being talked about yet - I'd guess whoever is PM will lose though - 07/05/2010 04:04:03 PM 983 Views
I suspect a great deal of the problem is George Osborn - 07/05/2010 04:09:51 PM 989 Views
Re: I suspect a great deal of the problem is George Osborn - 07/05/2010 04:24:56 PM 864 Views
Yes. - 07/05/2010 04:26:50 PM 742 Views
Re: I suspect a great deal of the problem is George Osborn - 07/05/2010 04:28:45 PM 942 Views
Re: I suspect a great deal of the problem is George Osborn - 07/05/2010 04:34:41 PM 923 Views
I'm sure he is - 07/05/2010 04:25:20 PM 994 Views
Heh. - 07/05/2010 04:27:44 PM 1036 Views
Re: Heh. - 07/05/2010 04:43:18 PM 1032 Views
Re: I'm sure he is - 07/05/2010 04:40:07 PM 965 Views
Cameron might be in trouble anyway. - 07/05/2010 06:25:14 PM 1075 Views
If they got PR as part of the deal it would be worth it - 07/05/2010 02:42:36 PM 1078 Views
Possibly. - 07/05/2010 02:53:28 PM 1098 Views
Re: Possibly. - 07/05/2010 03:00:55 PM 920 Views
I didn't mean from that point of view. - 07/05/2010 03:05:05 PM 966 Views
Re: I didn't mean from that point of view. - 07/05/2010 03:18:57 PM 980 Views
Short term pain for long term gain - 07/05/2010 03:02:51 PM 1064 Views
Re: Indeed - 07/05/2010 03:45:00 PM 996 Views
Re: Indeed - 07/05/2010 03:59:41 PM 1087 Views
Here's what i would do to sink the Tories - 07/05/2010 04:06:10 PM 950 Views
that does sound strange - 07/05/2010 10:57:10 AM 922 Views
The breakdown is pretty wack - 07/05/2010 11:07:20 AM 951 Views
Tell me about it. - 07/05/2010 11:14:44 AM 947 Views
I liked that as well - 07/05/2010 11:46:42 AM 1015 Views
I'm in the Cities of London and Westminster constituency. - 07/05/2010 11:56:04 AM 977 Views
Not that I'd ever try to one-up you. - 07/05/2010 12:54:47 PM 1022 Views
- 07/05/2010 01:44:03 PM 936 Views
Re: The breakdown is pretty wack - 07/05/2010 03:23:32 PM 949 Views
Same here - 07/05/2010 03:47:51 PM 933 Views
Re: Same here - 07/05/2010 03:56:46 PM 1059 Views
A simple change is all - 07/05/2010 01:16:16 PM 991 Views
That's not a simple change. THIS is a simple change: - 07/05/2010 01:59:09 PM 970 Views
Not that simple - 07/05/2010 02:45:00 PM 928 Views
Because my school was a polling station we used to get the day off every polling day - 07/05/2010 02:51:18 PM 1091 Views
Show off - 07/05/2010 02:53:16 PM 926 Views
Re: Not that simple - 07/05/2010 03:04:57 PM 1091 Views
Re: Not that simple - 07/05/2010 03:14:46 PM 1075 Views
Re: Not that simple - 07/05/2010 03:20:55 PM 778 Views
PR is hardly too difficult to implement and is much more democratic - 07/05/2010 02:48:01 PM 963 Views
I hate the list system. - 07/05/2010 02:55:39 PM 992 Views
There are many different versions - 07/05/2010 03:10:38 PM 927 Views
It's that bad i registered to moan. - 07/05/2010 02:53:37 PM 999 Views
Conservatives win and the stock market plummets. j/k - 07/05/2010 03:40:11 PM 888 Views
Oh, and the other interesting thing will be seeing whether the Conservatives offer.... - 07/05/2010 03:57:52 PM 1050 Views
I like John Major - 07/05/2010 04:01:03 PM 943 Views
There's only one the LibDems will be interested in though. - 07/05/2010 06:30:55 PM 1042 Views
But - 07/05/2010 08:21:11 PM 982 Views
Isn't that the very definition of a coalition? - 07/05/2010 08:16:05 PM 969 Views
So I'm just one of those upstart colonists....explain to me what is going on.... - 07/05/2010 05:26:59 PM 919 Views
Basically... - 07/05/2010 06:43:10 PM 955 Views
And things are changing already - 08/05/2010 04:08:47 PM 1037 Views
To be fair, I don't know it makes for much of a change - 08/05/2010 04:20:26 PM 1045 Views
I thought they weren't allowed to do that if Brown isn't Prime Minister? - 08/05/2010 04:52:39 PM 1000 Views
The latter, I'd say. - 08/05/2010 05:43:23 PM 1297 Views
Brown is PM at the moment - 08/05/2010 06:16:48 PM 939 Views
They certainly can. - 09/05/2010 04:37:46 PM 1020 Views
God, our system is fucked up *NM* - 07/05/2010 06:25:04 PM 561 Views
If i were the tories - 07/05/2010 11:28:43 PM 974 Views
Sounds like the pressure is on for Cameron - 08/05/2010 02:01:49 PM 991 Views
Hmmm - 13/05/2010 12:08:04 PM 1285 Views
Completely uncalled for! - 13/05/2010 01:12:05 PM 1100 Views
How was he supposed to know that at the time he made the post? - 13/05/2010 09:52:24 PM 1391 Views
Re: How was he supposed to know that at the time he made the post? - 13/05/2010 10:59:35 PM 988 Views
Yes I jumped the gun on the 12 - 14/05/2010 09:53:49 AM 972 Views
Re: Yes I jumped the gun on the 12 - 14/05/2010 10:45:35 AM 884 Views

Reply to Message