I ask this because for the most part my observation of such is that "gritty" has meant the inclusion of detailed descriptions of violence, sexuality, profanity, etc (usually all rolled up into one) to enhance "realism" when the effect to me comes across as shock-value entertainment with no real purpose other than the spectactle of itself.
If people want that kind of shock entertainment, that's perfectly fine: indeed, I'm happy they have a source from which to indulge their interests.
For myself, however, the most notorious authors of such works (Goodkind, Martin, Bakker) have been the only authors whose books I never enjoyed and have been the only series I've never finished reading. In particular, I disliked Bakker so much I had to resort to skimming the latter half of the first book just to find out out happens when the description of the book and premise of the series is one I would normally find extremely interesting.
If people want that kind of shock entertainment, that's perfectly fine: indeed, I'm happy they have a source from which to indulge their interests.
For myself, however, the most notorious authors of such works (Goodkind, Martin, Bakker) have been the only authors whose books I never enjoyed and have been the only series I've never finished reading. In particular, I disliked Bakker so much I had to resort to skimming the latter half of the first book just to find out out happens when the description of the book and premise of the series is one I would normally find extremely interesting.
Although I do think Bakker does try to use this over the top violence to make a point about our dependence on violence as a resort (among a great many other things), I usually feel down a bit after reading his work because it is too unrelenting in its pessimistic view of human nature. Martin I think is doing more than just having violence for violence's sake, but I think much of those memorable scenes stem more from his background as a horror writer than any conscious attempt to be "gritty" (a term I despise and usually put in scare quotes to note this). Goodkind is just a horrid writer, both in talent and in content.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.
Violence, rape, and agency in the "gritty fantasies"
17/12/2011 01:36:54 PM
- 1740 Views
Martin, Goodkind...
18/12/2011 01:58:33 PM
- 1043 Views
On more of a "meta" level, what makes a fantasy story "gritty" in the first place?
19/12/2011 02:58:57 PM
- 918 Views
There has to be something more, though.
19/12/2011 03:47:56 PM
- 1072 Views
Re: There has to be something more, though.
19/12/2011 05:29:30 PM
- 949 Views
Re: There has to be something more, though.
19/12/2011 09:06:14 PM
- 925 Views
My problem with aSoIaF...
20/12/2011 05:16:42 AM
- 973 Views
The Rhoynish influence pretty much ends in Dorne.
20/12/2011 06:15:54 AM
- 953 Views
And that makes sense?
20/12/2011 08:54:16 AM
- 1042 Views
Yes and no.
20/12/2011 03:10:54 PM
- 1067 Views
Re: Yes and no.
26/12/2011 03:12:01 AM
- 932 Views
The power and influence of women in the Middle Ages was limited, but not non-existent.
26/12/2011 01:37:40 PM
- 898 Views
Re: The power and influence of women in the Middle Ages was limited, but not non-existent.
29/12/2011 02:47:06 AM
- 1020 Views
Re: There has to be something more, though.
20/12/2011 12:21:39 PM
- 881 Views
That's my general take as well
20/12/2011 07:15:51 AM
- 867 Views
Re: On more of a "meta" level, what makes a fantasy story "gritty" in the first place?
26/12/2011 01:15:35 AM
- 993 Views