Active Users:492 Time:25/11/2024 05:52:43 PM
Re: No, not at all. Camilla Send a noteboard - 24/09/2009 10:08:26 AM
By that I mean, do you read only one book at the time? Do you have to finish that book before you can pick up another?

It happens very seldom.
Or do you read a little here and a little there, sticking with a book for a while, stopping by to have a taste at another, before finishing the first?

Almost always. I'm currently reading three books and have begun to read a few pages in two additional books. I usually need to read several books at a time since I must be in a mood for reading books. It's hard to read a particular book if I'm not in the right mood for it. So several books --> always have something to read no matter the mood I'm in. However, sometimes I'm in a mood when no book interests me and I don't read books for a week or two.
I am very much of the latter type. I read books through all the time, but quite frequently I will have put another book aside in order to read the one I am currently reading without interruptions. I read by craving. I don't know whether this is a side-effect of working with books all the time, or just a natural part of the human condition. And so I ask.


That sounds like me.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were? - 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM 1745 Views
I'm reading three books right now. - 23/09/2009 09:30:53 AM 1427 Views
I am on 20 - 23/09/2009 10:00:39 AM 1250 Views
Yes - 23/09/2009 09:41:31 AM 1386 Views
Re: Yes - 23/09/2009 09:59:16 AM 1349 Views
Not really - 23/09/2009 06:10:18 PM 1390 Views
I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM 1311 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM 1392 Views
Hmm - 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM 1337 Views
Re: Hmm - 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM 1309 Views
I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:38:14 PM 1363 Views
Re: I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:39:47 PM 1121 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM 1265 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 01:17:05 PM 1342 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 05/10/2009 09:17:10 AM 1354 Views
Yes. - 23/09/2009 12:17:14 PM 1227 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 01:17:41 PM 1294 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 02:55:43 PM 1236 Views
Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 12:44:45 PM 1330 Views
Re: Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 01:18:58 PM 1306 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM 1211 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM 1274 Views
If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:26:06 PM 1196 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:38:59 PM 1361 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 03:15:12 PM 1203 Views
Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 01:49:00 PM 1328 Views
Re: Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 02:36:23 PM 1270 Views
Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:56:47 PM 1287 Views
Re: Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:58:28 PM 1250 Views
Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:14:02 PM 1216 Views
Re: Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM 1211 Views
Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:15:30 PM 1268 Views
Re: Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:17:35 PM 1300 Views
It sucks, believe me. - 02/10/2009 03:46:47 PM 1713 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now - 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM 1286 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now. - 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM 1348 Views
It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM 1192 Views
Re: It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:55:27 PM 1294 Views
Bought it. - 24/09/2009 04:13:44 PM 1281 Views
Re: Bought it. - 24/09/2009 05:39:16 PM 1251 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour. - 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM 1260 Views
Pfff, dream on *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:44:22 PM 645 Views
Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM 1244 Views
Re: Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 05:31:04 PM 1283 Views
some of them are starting to feel neglected, though. - 23/09/2009 05:44:23 PM 1323 Views
This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM 1293 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM 1308 Views
best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM 1311 Views
Re: best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM 1139 Views
that's a weird argument. - 23/09/2009 08:31:01 PM 1298 Views
Re: that's a weird argument. - 24/09/2009 09:18:57 AM 1205 Views
I was about to reply with something similar. - 23/09/2009 05:52:07 PM 1294 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM 1330 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM 1255 Views
That it is. - 23/09/2009 11:24:45 PM 1204 Views
hells no - 23/09/2009 07:27:49 PM 1241 Views
Sensible *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:54:22 PM 534 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM 1154 Views
Re: Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:55:06 PM 1128 Views
I don't read books I find boring unless I'm required to. - 23/09/2009 11:36:17 PM 1226 Views
nope - 23/09/2009 07:58:53 PM 1132 Views
Re: nope - 24/09/2009 09:18:28 AM 1211 Views
RT stole my post title. - 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM 1358 Views
Re: RT stole my post title. - 24/09/2009 09:54:13 AM 1121 Views
Well - 24/09/2009 08:00:12 PM 1472 Views
Re: Well - 25/09/2009 09:31:29 AM 1623 Views
Very Monogamous - 23/09/2009 11:02:32 PM 1394 Views
Re: Very Monogamous - 24/09/2009 09:55:50 AM 1280 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy. - 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM 1276 Views
In all things, or just marriage and books? *NM* - 24/09/2009 10:03:21 AM 626 Views
In principle I have nothing against multiple spouses. - 24/09/2009 11:08:49 PM 1235 Views
Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM 1324 Views
Re: Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM 1348 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM 1171 Views
Re: - 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM 1124 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM 1164 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM 1333 Views
That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM 1268 Views
Re: That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM 1144 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one - 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM 1222 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe - 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM 1321 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no? - 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM 1406 Views
where? - 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM 1182 Views
Here - 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM 1305 Views
I have of course read A Study in Emerald - 24/09/2009 03:48:45 PM 1251 Views
That's the earlier anthology - 24/09/2009 03:56:42 PM 1194 Views
Sort of - 24/09/2009 12:30:04 AM 1268 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 10:05:07 AM 1232 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 02:27:14 PM 1279 Views
Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 04:43:06 AM 1296 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 10:06:10 AM 1268 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 26/09/2009 05:06:07 PM 1455 Views
No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 06:22:24 AM 1267 Views
Re: No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 10:08:26 AM 1382 Views
Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM 1269 Views
Re: Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 02:59:42 PM 1320 Views
No, confusion has nothing to do with it. - 25/09/2009 02:08:16 PM 1357 Views
mmm, polyamory! - 24/09/2009 05:48:04 PM 1213 Views
People must understand that we have urges that cannot always be - 24/09/2009 05:49:25 PM 1125 Views
I used to only read one at a time - 24/09/2009 08:46:46 PM 1387 Views
Re: I used to only read one at a time - 25/09/2009 09:33:30 AM 1316 Views
Only read One book at a time. You make me feel bad. - 25/09/2009 02:44:51 AM 1212 Views
On behalf of my books? - 25/09/2009 09:40:37 AM 1094 Views
Honestly, - 25/09/2009 03:07:53 AM 1327 Views
Re: Honestly, - 25/09/2009 09:42:04 AM 1227 Views
I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 04:50:48 PM 1311 Views
Re: I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 07:05:21 PM 1370 Views
No - 02/10/2009 05:02:51 PM 1298 Views
Re: No - 02/10/2009 07:45:39 PM 1332 Views

Reply to Message