One really gets the impression that most years the Academy *wants* people's first reaction to the Nobel Prize for Literature to be "never heard of". In cases when it goes to some writer who is unknown largely because his country/language is lesser-known in the West, that is perhaps a good thing as it gives those literary markets a bit more attention abroad, but when it's just some European, forgive me if I'm less than impressed, or interested.
I thought it was almost non-negiotable that the award would go to a North African or Middle Eastern writer this year, with the Arab Spring making the region even more notable and the fact that Adonis/Adunis being one of the perennial favourites for the award still without the prize.
There is still an obvious Western Hemisphere/Anglo-Scandinavian bias to the award.
"I mean, if everyone had a soul, there would be no contrast by which we could appreciate it. For giving us this perspective, we thank you." - Nate
Tomas Transtromer wins the Nobel Prize for Literature.
06/10/2011 12:02:12 PM
- 1066 Views
Who?
06/10/2011 02:14:23 PM
- 832 Views
Yeah, that was my impression of it.
06/10/2011 02:28:02 PM
- 822 Views
What a Transtravesty.
06/10/2011 02:59:09 PM
- 761 Views
Meh. I guess they were under pressure to produce a Swedish winner again.
06/10/2011 05:34:05 PM
- 902 Views
Re: Meh. I guess they were under pressure to produce a Swedish winner again.
08/10/2011 05:32:12 PM
- 977 Views
Nobel Prizes just continue to become more and more irrelevant..... *NM*
10/10/2011 03:21:43 AM
- 413 Views