Generally, the more plot-driven a story is, the lower the quality of the writing (e.g., Dan Brown, Robert Jordan). A spoiler helps people focus more on the style, on the message and on the details.
It's why knowing the stories of classics, for example, doesn't detract from the enjoyment of reading them.
*MySmiley*
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Interesting article: "Spoilers don't spoil anything."
11/08/2011 08:33:42 PM
- 1953 Views
It's probably one of those things that works "in general"
11/08/2011 08:43:03 PM
- 1099 Views
I sometimes find spoilers can ADD tension (a *MAJOR* aDwD spoiler contained within!!!)
12/08/2011 03:02:18 AM
- 1013 Views
Here's a rebuttal.
11/08/2011 09:02:06 PM
- 1263 Views
That rebuttal is about as strong as the original article (not very ).
11/08/2011 10:15:36 PM
- 1252 Views
I think in many cases there certainly is an "intended" way to enjoy a book...
11/08/2011 11:17:30 PM
- 1000 Views
Tor.com has a vested interest in us not getting spoilers
12/08/2011 03:24:20 AM
- 927 Views
It really depends on the story, and of course on the reader.
11/08/2011 11:03:01 PM
- 1062 Views
I pretty much agree with your opinion here. It depends on the spoiler and the book.
12/08/2011 12:45:02 PM
- 954 Views
Spoilers don't spoil anything if the story is well-written.
12/08/2011 04:25:44 AM
- 886 Views
And I agree with this too.
12/08/2011 12:46:03 PM
- 967 Views
It depends on what you want to get out of a story
19/08/2011 12:16:42 AM
- 941 Views