...for the first time in over ten years as well.
I say reread, but really I decided to download the audiobook and try it out. I couldn't bring myself to actually read the books.
Now, whilst I quite enjoyed The Eye of the World as a pleasant adventure, it's impressive that I managed to get to the end. More than anything else, the early dialogue in Emond's Field nearly drove me mad. It was largely how I imagine Little House on the Prairie to be (I never saw the programme), but turned up to eleven. Fortunately I was generally doing some kind of household task when listening, so I was able to zone out.
Obviously I've changed between the ages of 12 and 23. I've got one of them lit'rature degrees and everything, so the books weren't going to stand up in quite the way they used to. I've been wondering if I'm seeing even more flaws than I would have done if I'd gone into the books now without having read them before, rather than with an idealised preconception in my mind. Who knows?
What is interesting, though, is that despite finding the books, uhm, questionable in their quality, is the fact that I've kept listening. I'm on The Shadow Rising now, although I've been distracted by several other books lately (as an aside, I'm finding Tristram Shandy incredibly disappointing so far), and I've found myself considering all the old theories that used to bug me so much. I'm on the WoT board right now for that very reason. It doesn't make much sense, but the over-arching plot has got under my skin, which I think is pretty impressive.
Apologies if the little I've written is a garbled mess, I'm well on my way to sleep as I type.
I say reread, but really I decided to download the audiobook and try it out. I couldn't bring myself to actually read the books.
Now, whilst I quite enjoyed The Eye of the World as a pleasant adventure, it's impressive that I managed to get to the end. More than anything else, the early dialogue in Emond's Field nearly drove me mad. It was largely how I imagine Little House on the Prairie to be (I never saw the programme), but turned up to eleven. Fortunately I was generally doing some kind of household task when listening, so I was able to zone out.
Obviously I've changed between the ages of 12 and 23. I've got one of them lit'rature degrees and everything, so the books weren't going to stand up in quite the way they used to. I've been wondering if I'm seeing even more flaws than I would have done if I'd gone into the books now without having read them before, rather than with an idealised preconception in my mind. Who knows?
What is interesting, though, is that despite finding the books, uhm, questionable in their quality, is the fact that I've kept listening. I'm on The Shadow Rising now, although I've been distracted by several other books lately (as an aside, I'm finding Tristram Shandy incredibly disappointing so far), and I've found myself considering all the old theories that used to bug me so much. I'm on the WoT board right now for that very reason. It doesn't make much sense, but the over-arching plot has got under my skin, which I think is pretty impressive.
Apologies if the little I've written is a garbled mess, I'm well on my way to sleep as I type.
I wonder how I would react to Little House on the Praire now, considering the show was still on when I was a child Never really have listened to the audiobooks, except for that Ch. 2 of TGS sample, which was in turns dreadful and oddly fascinating, in a train wreck sort of way.
Couldn't imagine listening to Tristram Shandy, unless you meant you were reading it? I found it to be good, but also a book that had to be taken in small doses lest the wit become overwhelming.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.
Re-reading WoT Ten Years Later
16/04/2010 06:07:40 AM
- 2862 Views
The Eye of the World (1997-2000, 2010 reads)
16/04/2010 06:08:54 AM
- 1326 Views
Re: The Eye of the World (1997-2000, 2010 reads)
16/04/2010 06:29:53 PM
- 1052 Views
I think you misrepresent me
16/04/2010 11:15:34 PM
- 951 Views
Re: I think you misrepresent me
17/04/2010 02:56:53 PM
- 976 Views
MA in History? Is there a more useless degree?
16/04/2010 09:56:36 PM
- 913 Views
Yes, whatever degree you have/are studying for
16/04/2010 11:12:55 PM
- 908 Views
Funny, I started my own first-ever reread not long ago.
17/04/2010 02:16:35 AM
- 1001 Views
Must be something in the water, no?
17/04/2010 02:28:23 AM
- 1018 Views
Aww...
16/04/2010 07:58:27 PM
- 1014 Views
That's next month or June
16/04/2010 11:12:02 PM
- 880 Views
Be sure to send me a noteboard then .
17/04/2010 03:45:46 AM
- 902 Views
Oh, I'd post it at this site as well, perhaps
17/04/2010 03:51:19 AM
- 854 Views
Yeah, but I only lurk in the OF when I'm interested in getting new books...
17/04/2010 04:00:14 AM
- 868 Views
The more posts from this larry guy I read, the more I think.........
18/04/2010 08:56:34 AM
- 1041 Views
Interesting metatextual analysis there
18/04/2010 09:47:43 AM
- 1067 Views
Nice, but in the future...
18/04/2010 04:04:07 PM
- 946 Views
I know...
18/04/2010 08:11:18 PM
- 898 Views
Re: The more posts from this larry guy I read, the more I think.........
18/04/2010 10:26:12 AM
- 1051 Views
The Great Hunt (1997-2000, 2010 reads)
19/04/2010 09:22:40 AM
- 1027 Views
It's interesting you thought this about The Great Hunt.
19/04/2010 07:06:57 PM
- 851 Views
Yeah, I almost gave up this series after The Eye of the World too. *NM*
19/04/2010 08:38:25 PM
- 536 Views
Winter's Heart (2000 initial read; 2010 re-read)
07/05/2010 01:35:13 PM
- 817 Views
Re: Winter's Heart (2000 initial read; 2010 re-read)
08/05/2010 09:43:31 AM
- 929 Views