Active Users:519 Time:23/11/2024 03:39:48 PM
Meh. Growing pains. And unlike the White Tower split, this will not be a refreshing shake-up Cannoli Send a noteboard - 16/04/2010 02:45:21 PM
I don't think you can count on the Asha'man [as a whole] as being reliable or loyal to Rand. We still have Elaida's prophecy of the Black Tower being "rent in blood and flame with Sisters walking its grounds"... and from what we last saw, that's most likely to arise from internal matters.


Notice how no one argues that the Tower split was anything but a welcome respite that gave the good guys much needed breathing room. The Tower as it existed would have hindered the rise of the people needed to save the world. By contrast, no one says the samething about the Black Tower - the anticipated split is dreaded as another problem for Rand & co.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Does Rand really need the White Tower? - 15/04/2010 06:42:36 PM 1232 Views
Re: Does Rand really need the White Tower? - 15/04/2010 09:29:50 PM 559 Views
Meh. Growing pains. And unlike the White Tower split, this will not be a refreshing shake-up - 16/04/2010 02:45:21 PM 688 Views
Why is it a question of what Rand needs? - 16/04/2010 02:51:43 AM 571 Views
What else is important right now? - 16/04/2010 02:41:57 PM 610 Views
Depends - 16/04/2010 06:50:53 AM 609 Views
I don't necessarily disagree... - 16/04/2010 02:54:28 PM 578 Views
some respectful disagreement, if you don't mind - 17/04/2010 04:04:32 AM 575 Views
Re: some respectful disagreement, if you don't mind - 17/04/2010 08:22:22 PM 609 Views
good points about the linking - 17/04/2010 11:13:21 PM 563 Views
Rand will need the tower once Egwene is done with it! - 28/04/2010 06:23:13 AM 467 Views
This should be... fun! - 28/04/2010 07:09:16 AM 461 Views

Reply to Message