The author has made it clear he doesn't like the series. Should we subject our board to twelve highly negative reviews? The more I read his reviews, the more it's apparent that he's decided from the onset to tear the series to piece. There's no positive to the negative, and some of his criticisms are completely absurd.
I'm kind of hoping that lots of people complain about this thread so that I can lock it.
First, I've kept this all in this one post.
Second, there are some valid points contained within here. Do you want to shut down any discussion of his points just because you disagree with them?
Third, what are the "absurd" points? I think that might make for an interesting counterpoint discussion here.
Fourth, why would you "hope" that, Mark? Do you want me to stop posting about a different viewpoint to this series that another author is presenting elsewhere? Because I suppose I could blog about it and get a wider range of opinions from fans and non-fans alike than if there is a desire from the leadership here for there to be nothing but condemnation here.
Essentially we're supposed to be a collection of fans of RJ's work. There's really no point putting up reviews about why other authors don't like the work we voluntarily choose to spend time admiring. It's exactly as inane as posting about why you hate stamps on a stamp collector's site, and while it may be factual to read and logical to bring other views about the hobby, it starts to get on everybody's nerves after the tenth time, or twelfth as it will soon be.
Other posters have responded in detail to his increasingly silly reviews, most notably DomA who gave the professor the academic condemnation he deserves, so there's really no need for me to voice my opinion. While I agree with some of his earlier points, it should be obvious even to an amateur reader that he's becoming increasingly nasty and even less factually correct with each review. There are many aspects of the series he completely doesn't understand, and even though he's a renowned writer, he himself admits he skims the books. An expert on cars who jumps in and then out and writes a review on it. Nothing to be admired really. He's clearly on a roll, and he's fueled by the malignancy of other disdainful posters who cheer him on. His only real goal is to make the next review a one-up in sarcasm and one-liners compared to the previous one. A troll, albeit a gilded one.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Fan of Lanfear
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT.
19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM
- 12433 Views
Heh, While I agree with him about it being derivative, I still encourage people to read it.
20/03/2010 02:36:47 AM
- 2211 Views
My problem with the reviews:
20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM
- 2845 Views
Hear Hear !!!
.......................
=
........................ *NM*
20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
- 1361 Views



well I agree and disagree
20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM
- 2594 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree
20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM
- 2116 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses
20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM
- 2522 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ?
20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM
- 2263 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes
20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM
- 2268 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ?
21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM
- 2089 Views
My sister called me chicken once
10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM
- 2135 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses
23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM
- 2169 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response
24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
- 2098 Views

On a completely unrelated note...
24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM
- 1968 Views
Ha!
24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
- 2010 Views

My congratulations then
. *NM*
24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
- 1921 Views

Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series
22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
- 2149 Views

There's a point to it?
22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
- 2114 Views

Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM*
24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM
- 1328 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you?
24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
- 2062 Views

I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place
24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM
- 2043 Views
And which, arguably, could be viewed as being done in a hackneyed way
24/03/2010 07:15:55 AM
- 2081 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening?
09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM
- 2106 Views
pfft wth-ever
26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM
- 1938 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM
- 2187 Views
bla bla bla
29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM
- 2055 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you
*NM*
29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
- 1504 Views

You must have low standards for entertainment
29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM
- 1996 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment
29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM
- 2130 Views
I know you were, thus the
at the least of my comment
29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
- 1945 Views


Unimpressed
29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM
- 2390 Views
Isn't that a bit uncharitable, Dom, considering how much you approved of what I did with CoT?
30/03/2010 12:03:48 AM
- 2399 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM
- 2094 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again.
29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM
- 1972 Views
Awards
29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM
- 1933 Views
That link is out of date
29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM
- 1923 Views
Re: That link is out of date
29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM
- 2056 Views
This is a battle of win/lose?
29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM
- 1971 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose?
29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM
- 2002 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM
- 1972 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM
- 2153 Views
The final point explains the "defense"
30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM
- 1875 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense"
30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM
- 1863 Views
No, no, no
30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM
- 1918 Views
Re: No, no, no
30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM
- 2043 Views
Still continuing, huh?
31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM
- 1985 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh?
31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM
- 1951 Views
He's now reviewed the third book
26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM
- 2175 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him
.
29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
- 1911 Views

I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that
29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM
- 1903 Views
Hah!
29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM
- 1942 Views
Well...
29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM
- 1834 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess.
29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM
- 2012 Views
I suppose
29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM
- 1934 Views
Re: I suppose
30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM
- 2083 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM
- 1881 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM
- 2042 Views
But why only them?
30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM
- 1966 Views
The Shadow Rising review
02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM
- 2161 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling
02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM
- 10721 Views
That would be a mistake
02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM
- 2168 Views
Re: That would be a mistake
02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM
- 1928 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter
10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM
- 2052 Views
Little late to this one as well
10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM
- 2070 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit
10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM
- 2136 Views
I guess I just presumed that people would read the header to his blog
12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
- 1993 Views

What review? I couldn't find one...
02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM
- 2134 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one...
02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM
- 2139 Views
See my comment below
02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM
- 2188 Views
Re: See my comment below
03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM
- 2549 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week
07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM
- 2386 Views
Speaking of irritation
02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM
- 2104 Views
To be fair, even among the RaFOers there have been tons of posts that missed certain events
09/04/2010 03:47:30 PM
- 1929 Views
Commentary, then?
02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
- 1980 Views

Here's the thing...
02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM
- 1920 Views
Re: Here's the thing...
02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM
- 1773 Views
Re: Commentary, then?
05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
- 1903 Views

for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work
08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM
- 2108 Views
1400 words is long-winded?
09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
- 2146 Views

since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded
09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM
- 2026 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit
10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM
- 2051 Views
You are very defensive over this
10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM
- 1867 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else
12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM
- 1910 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts
07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM
- 2085 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM
- 1948 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
- 1798 Views
Which Invisible Man?
09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM
- 2036 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner
08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM
- 1982 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
- 1973 Views

Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
- 2522 Views

Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
- 1985 Views

why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts?
10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM
- 2007 Views
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest
12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM
- 2308 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus
09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM
- 1967 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument...
09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM
- 1865 Views
Well, what was really resolved here?
10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM
- 1949 Views
Well...
12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM
- 2028 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then?
12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM
- 2023 Views
Yes...
12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
- 1771 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon?
12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM
- 2091 Views
I guess...
13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM
- 2087 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest
13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM
- 3203 Views
Nah...
13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM
- 1773 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others
13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM
- 1859 Views
Ah, well...
13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM
- 1802 Views
Dismissive, much?
13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
- 1987 Views

About that bifurcation...
14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM
- 1932 Views
Sorry that I was busy yesterday and didn't have a chance to reply until now
15/04/2010 01:46:54 PM
- 2092 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS.
09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM
- 1973 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary
16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM
- 1932 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven!
16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM
- 1850 Views
Yeah, I noticed that
16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
- 1767 Views

I would love the see him review Goodkind...
16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM
- 1987 Views
I don't wish that on anyone who doesn't have copious amounts of alcohol
16/04/2010 11:57:41 PM
- 1901 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM
- 2043 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM
- 1977 Views
I disagree
29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM
- 1789 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary
07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM
- 2108 Views
Winter's Heart
21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM
- 2085 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM
- 1949 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM
- 2099 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot.
28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM
- 1961 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote:
28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM
- 2272 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him
25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM
- 2052 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake
25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM
- 9496 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark?
26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM
- 1966 Views
Oh come on...
26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM
- 2076 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much...
26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM
- 2065 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice...
26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM
- 2073 Views
And your point is...?
27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM
- 2073 Views
Well...
27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM
- 2040 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble
27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM
- 2207 Views
It's not about honour being beschmirched. It's about poor quality arguments. *NM*
30/03/2011 04:09:23 PM
- 1187 Views
One year later...
27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM
- 1905 Views
Re: One year later...
28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM
- 2145 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes.
28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM
- 2146 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM*
30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM
- 1231 Views
Jealous?
30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM
- 1905 Views
You both are jelous of Jordan's tremendous succes.
30/03/2011 10:27:36 PM
- 1931 Views
Please learn how to spell the word "jealous" before tossing it about in the cavalier fashion you do
30/03/2011 10:54:36 PM
- 1964 Views
The fact that you teach is supposed to be a surprise?
31/03/2011 01:23:45 PM
- 1882 Views
After reading the standard-issue checklist of generic, tossabout pejoratives...
01/04/2011 03:06:18 PM
- 2026 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM*
30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM
- 1152 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM*
30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM
- 1278 Views
Yep!
30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
- 1853 Views

He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM*
30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM
- 1163 Views