Active Users:378 Time:04/04/2025 11:30:04 PM
Re: So... Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 01/04/2010 06:41:34 PM
You agree at least that it's possible to deduce before LoC that Slayer is a deadly assassin/bounty hunter/hitman of the Shadow and uses TAR in the flesh? And you also agree that it's possible to deduce that Slayer and Luc are the same being? (e.g. both have the inhuman smell and suffer from Perrin's shot)


Yes, (I do agree with these.)

If you agree with this, your only problem seems to have been, how Slayer can use TAR in the flesh. You apparently (wrongly) thought that Luc is some kind of Dreamwalker, but instead of him entering TAR in the dream, the dead Isam is then somehow in TAR " in the flesh" (although he is dead..), like a Hero of the Horn, or something like that. Irrespective of the question if your idea makes any sense (in my view, it doesn't), I believe one could possibly also come up with the (actually correct!) idea that the DO gave LuC/Slayer the ability to enter TAR in the flesh at one point in the World and exist TAR again at any point, basically like a channeler can use TAR with a Gateway (we see that creatures of the Shadow often have channeler-like abilities). In this case Slayer could of course also use TAR to travel distances in the Real World, which would e.g. better explain how can Slayer quickly reach the Blight to get more Shadowspawn and quickly return to the Two Rivers or how he finds his victims. Naturally to have such an ability would make sense for someone, who was precisely created to make assassinations, namely to "course and kill". It would also explain the strange assassinations in the Stone and the WT, which apparently weren't done by a normal Gray Man, but by a special assassin.


That my idea wasn't correct is pretty obvious, but I'm not using it here because I somehow think that my initial impressions upon reading the book because I well know that I can be quite oblivious. Even as of Crossroads of Twilight I hadn't realised that Ishamael had appeared on screen. I'm using it because even now, knowing that it is wrong, knowing what comes later, it still makes more sense given the available information than divining the truth. It's not only more consistent with what Slayer does in that book,it also ties in neatly with the Dark Prophecy and the idea that dead souls can inhabit the Dreamworld, which we also discover in this book or the next.

Now, trying to defend this hypothesis would be futile, because it's a fact that it is wrong due to Winter's Heart. It is simply an example of a possibility for explaining Slayer that is consistent with what we have read.

Now, as for guessing that Slayer could jump in and out of the Dreamworld and use it for high-speed travel, that is inconsistent with what we know at the time. You've tried to provide an explanation for why he came back, but only because you started with the conclusion that he chose to do so. Nothing from that scene indicates that he had something precious he came back for, the entire scene indicates that he wants to be as far as possible as soon as possible. Even in retrospect, I doubt Slayer chose to come back. The way he disappeared after getting shot is inconsistent with the 'blurry motion' that Slayer has used to quickly move through the Dreamworld at high speeds, I still believe that he was simply Dreamwalking, though obviously I now know that this would be because he chose to do so, possibly so that nobody would realise something was amiss if someone entered his room while he was hunting.

The point is, the only incident of travel between the Dreamworld and the real world is consistent with Dreamwalking and inconsistent with travelling. How can your conclusion, at the time, be anything other than Slayer was dreaming?

I actually realise this is not especially important because even if Slayer couldn't jump through dreams, he still could have infiltrated the palace of Andor through mundane stealth, but I think the initial point of this discussion is no longer the centre of interest :P.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 22/03/2010 01:53:54 AM 1832 Views
idle speculation != "Intuitivly obvious" - 22/03/2010 03:01:10 AM 631 Views
The best explanation for the "intuitively obvious"-comment is... - 22/03/2010 09:41:32 AM 648 Views
So again...how would Slayer know he was in the hallway? - 22/03/2010 03:18:51 PM 652 Views
I think Slayer spied on Asmo - 22/03/2010 03:45:20 PM 510 Views
Fair enough.... - 22/03/2010 06:25:25 PM 683 Views
I think... - 23/03/2010 09:31:41 AM 579 Views
I agree. Slayer is the most intuitively obvious candidate. *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:29:07 PM 239 Views
Slayer....the book4 minor villian? *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:34:52 PM 384 Views
Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 23/03/2010 09:11:39 AM 475 Views
Re: Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 28/03/2010 07:16:59 PM 505 Views
In my view, Graendal might have sent Slayer, which would explain her knowledge. *NM* - 29/03/2010 09:45:14 AM 507 Views
Actually that's one of my hang-ups about Slayer too - 06/04/2010 02:27:22 PM 489 Views
As far as I'm concerned... - 25/03/2010 06:42:53 AM 500 Views
The problem is that people don't read the books or at least ignore what is said about Slayer... - 25/03/2010 09:41:09 AM 492 Views
Correction... - 25/03/2010 05:22:46 PM 442 Views
So, basically... - 25/03/2010 05:50:42 PM 480 Views
The clues are there? - 25/03/2010 06:29:16 PM 486 Views
Re: The clues are there? - 26/03/2010 12:51:43 AM 466 Views
He wasn't being insulting, I don't think. - 26/03/2010 02:16:26 AM 513 Views
well, RJ was a nuclear engineer. 'Nuff said about obviousness, huh? - 26/03/2010 04:38:00 AM 515 Views
Apparently... - 26/03/2010 08:58:32 AM 491 Views
No it isn't. - 26/03/2010 05:43:02 PM 474 Views
You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 09:11:35 AM 502 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 05:23:35 PM 500 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 28/03/2010 08:17:40 PM 471 Views
Yes, it's Winter's Heart. - 29/03/2010 04:01:41 AM 485 Views
Both merged into one being - 29/03/2010 09:43:47 AM 515 Views
Not what I asked. - 29/03/2010 06:10:42 PM 463 Views
If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 06:59:16 PM 492 Views
Re: If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 07:46:39 PM 458 Views
That Basel Gill comparison just silly... - 29/03/2010 08:49:19 PM 510 Views
Clearly, one of you has proved that Basel Gill is Demandred *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:12:00 PM 245 Views
I've asked you only one question, repeatedly. - 30/03/2010 12:34:44 AM 544 Views
Yeah, and I repeatedly tried to show you the clues... - 30/03/2010 09:17:59 AM 474 Views
You have never provided anything even resembling evidence. - 30/03/2010 08:20:54 PM 442 Views
Dude - 30/03/2010 09:49:05 PM 428 Views
You know what's really embarrassing? - 30/03/2010 10:28:38 PM 563 Views
be nice *NM* - 31/03/2010 01:22:03 AM 226 Views
One last time... - 31/03/2010 09:18:01 AM 478 Views
Re: One last time... - 31/03/2010 06:20:24 PM 480 Views
No... - 31/03/2010 06:31:57 PM 485 Views
Re: No... - 31/03/2010 11:43:42 PM 474 Views
So... - 01/04/2010 10:22:31 AM 461 Views
Re: So... - 01/04/2010 06:41:34 PM 568 Views
Egwene did it though - 09/04/2010 02:26:10 AM 479 Views
Not before Lord of Chaos she didn't. - 09/04/2010 08:03:12 AM 463 Views
Rand does it in the end of TFoH, though, shortly before Asmo's death. *NM* - 09/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 237 Views
But we don't actually see that - 09/04/2010 12:23:37 PM 459 Views
Hmm. True, that. - 09/04/2010 07:28:15 PM 413 Views
I see what you are saying now - 09/04/2010 12:08:00 PM 413 Views
Yep - 09/04/2010 07:27:27 PM 440 Views
A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 04:31:49 PM 430 Views
Re: A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 05:03:32 PM 439 Views
First rule of balefire: - 25/03/2010 06:44:17 AM 430 Views
Yep, that's my understanding too. - 25/03/2010 07:00:39 PM 462 Views
On the servants theory - 25/03/2010 11:33:08 AM 437 Views
Rand's odd wounds - 29/03/2010 02:48:58 AM 426 Views
Who says the Dark One couldn't bring Asmodean back? Why would he want to? - 25/03/2010 05:50:55 AM 518 Views
RJ said that. *NM* - 25/03/2010 09:31:32 AM 415 Views
Do you have that quote handy? - 28/03/2010 07:01:06 PM 453 Views
From memory, but can't find the URL - 28/03/2010 08:09:29 PM 428 Views
Here: - 29/03/2010 09:48:36 AM 440 Views
thanks! good job *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:13:12 PM 202 Views
You dont address all the criteria - 30/03/2010 11:27:58 PM 436 Views
Did you mean me? *NM* - 31/03/2010 05:54:56 AM 198 Views
@Fanatic-Templar: Proof Slayer can't travel through T'A'R... - 31/03/2010 03:54:19 AM 432 Views
Exactly my point. - 31/03/2010 05:02:41 AM 449 Views
Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 05:56:46 AM 489 Views
Lan can swordfight with his boots? *NM* - 31/03/2010 06:41:53 AM 216 Views
I don't think so... read again *NM* - 31/03/2010 10:54:03 PM 191 Views
Re: Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 03:52:16 PM 456 Views
thanks! but as soon as I posted - 01/04/2010 03:43:59 AM 425 Views
Re: Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 14/05/2010 01:28:38 AM 484 Views

Reply to Message