Active Users:599 Time:24/11/2024 01:32:15 PM
One last time... Etzel Send a noteboard - 31/03/2010 09:18:01 AM
You can either enter TAR in the dream or in the flesh (some can do both). If you enter TAR in the flesh, you are there in the flesh. Slayer/Luc is in TAR in the flesh and thus entered TAR in the flesh before. If you can enter TAR in the flesh, you can naturally do it everywhere in the Real World, similar to leaving TAR at any location. From this ability, obviously given by the DO, and Slayer's apparent profession as hitman/assassin/bounty hunter for the Shadow, one can also deduce the other things, e.g. that Slayer likely killed the BA or the Gray Man.

Nothing necessarily indicates that Slayer is a Dreamwalker. I explained why it makes sense that he went back to Emond's Field, after he was shot. And obviously this also wasn't meant as a clue by RJ to indicate that Slayer is a Dreamwalker, contrary to what Hopper said, because Slayer actually uses TAR in the flesh. You simply interpreted this scene wrongly.
This message last edited by Etzel on 31/03/2010 at 09:25:54 AM
Reply to message
Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 22/03/2010 01:53:54 AM 1795 Views
idle speculation != "Intuitivly obvious" - 22/03/2010 03:01:10 AM 563 Views
The best explanation for the "intuitively obvious"-comment is... - 22/03/2010 09:41:32 AM 582 Views
So again...how would Slayer know he was in the hallway? - 22/03/2010 03:18:51 PM 582 Views
I think Slayer spied on Asmo - 22/03/2010 03:45:20 PM 449 Views
Fair enough.... - 22/03/2010 06:25:25 PM 606 Views
I think... - 23/03/2010 09:31:41 AM 518 Views
I agree. Slayer is the most intuitively obvious candidate. *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:29:07 PM 215 Views
Slayer....the book4 minor villian? *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:34:52 PM 355 Views
Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 23/03/2010 09:11:39 AM 411 Views
Re: Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 28/03/2010 07:16:59 PM 450 Views
In my view, Graendal might have sent Slayer, which would explain her knowledge. *NM* - 29/03/2010 09:45:14 AM 450 Views
Actually that's one of my hang-ups about Slayer too - 06/04/2010 02:27:22 PM 427 Views
As far as I'm concerned... - 25/03/2010 06:42:53 AM 439 Views
The problem is that people don't read the books or at least ignore what is said about Slayer... - 25/03/2010 09:41:09 AM 428 Views
Correction... - 25/03/2010 05:22:46 PM 416 Views
So, basically... - 25/03/2010 05:50:42 PM 420 Views
The clues are there? - 25/03/2010 06:29:16 PM 437 Views
Re: The clues are there? - 26/03/2010 12:51:43 AM 405 Views
He wasn't being insulting, I don't think. - 26/03/2010 02:16:26 AM 456 Views
well, RJ was a nuclear engineer. 'Nuff said about obviousness, huh? - 26/03/2010 04:38:00 AM 461 Views
Apparently... - 26/03/2010 08:58:32 AM 431 Views
No it isn't. - 26/03/2010 05:43:02 PM 416 Views
You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 09:11:35 AM 445 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 05:23:35 PM 448 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 28/03/2010 08:17:40 PM 410 Views
Yes, it's Winter's Heart. - 29/03/2010 04:01:41 AM 420 Views
Both merged into one being - 29/03/2010 09:43:47 AM 459 Views
Not what I asked. - 29/03/2010 06:10:42 PM 402 Views
If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 06:59:16 PM 441 Views
Re: If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 07:46:39 PM 404 Views
That Basel Gill comparison just silly... - 29/03/2010 08:49:19 PM 445 Views
Clearly, one of you has proved that Basel Gill is Demandred *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:12:00 PM 215 Views
I've asked you only one question, repeatedly. - 30/03/2010 12:34:44 AM 484 Views
Yeah, and I repeatedly tried to show you the clues... - 30/03/2010 09:17:59 AM 417 Views
You have never provided anything even resembling evidence. - 30/03/2010 08:20:54 PM 384 Views
Dude - 30/03/2010 09:49:05 PM 374 Views
You know what's really embarrassing? - 30/03/2010 10:28:38 PM 500 Views
be nice *NM* - 31/03/2010 01:22:03 AM 205 Views
One last time... - 31/03/2010 09:18:01 AM 418 Views
Re: One last time... - 31/03/2010 06:20:24 PM 415 Views
No... - 31/03/2010 06:31:57 PM 402 Views
Re: No... - 31/03/2010 11:43:42 PM 444 Views
So... - 01/04/2010 10:22:31 AM 405 Views
Re: So... - 01/04/2010 06:41:34 PM 503 Views
Egwene did it though - 09/04/2010 02:26:10 AM 420 Views
Not before Lord of Chaos she didn't. - 09/04/2010 08:03:12 AM 401 Views
Rand does it in the end of TFoH, though, shortly before Asmo's death. *NM* - 09/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 217 Views
But we don't actually see that - 09/04/2010 12:23:37 PM 404 Views
Hmm. True, that. - 09/04/2010 07:28:15 PM 353 Views
I see what you are saying now - 09/04/2010 12:08:00 PM 372 Views
Yep - 09/04/2010 07:27:27 PM 389 Views
A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 04:31:49 PM 371 Views
Re: A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 05:03:32 PM 381 Views
First rule of balefire: - 25/03/2010 06:44:17 AM 382 Views
Yep, that's my understanding too. - 25/03/2010 07:00:39 PM 401 Views
On the servants theory - 25/03/2010 11:33:08 AM 377 Views
Rand's odd wounds - 29/03/2010 02:48:58 AM 366 Views
Who says the Dark One couldn't bring Asmodean back? Why would he want to? - 25/03/2010 05:50:55 AM 454 Views
RJ said that. *NM* - 25/03/2010 09:31:32 AM 354 Views
Do you have that quote handy? - 28/03/2010 07:01:06 PM 387 Views
From memory, but can't find the URL - 28/03/2010 08:09:29 PM 373 Views
Here: - 29/03/2010 09:48:36 AM 376 Views
thanks! good job *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:13:12 PM 177 Views
You dont address all the criteria - 30/03/2010 11:27:58 PM 378 Views
Did you mean me? *NM* - 31/03/2010 05:54:56 AM 176 Views
@Fanatic-Templar: Proof Slayer can't travel through T'A'R... - 31/03/2010 03:54:19 AM 380 Views
Exactly my point. - 31/03/2010 05:02:41 AM 390 Views
Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 05:56:46 AM 428 Views
Lan can swordfight with his boots? *NM* - 31/03/2010 06:41:53 AM 193 Views
I don't think so... read again *NM* - 31/03/2010 10:54:03 PM 169 Views
Re: Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 03:52:16 PM 402 Views
thanks! but as soon as I posted - 01/04/2010 03:43:59 AM 377 Views
Re: Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 14/05/2010 01:28:38 AM 426 Views

Reply to Message