Active Users:361 Time:04/04/2025 12:06:30 AM
Too bad she didn't take the opportunity to drop the Oaths altogether. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 25/03/2010 02:14:32 PM
I'm so sick of them. I think it permanently makes the Aes Sedai illegitimate and passive.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
so egwene had almost all the aes sedai loose and reswear the oaths - 23/03/2010 04:45:00 PM 1521 Views
Doubt it. They were unbound for less than a minute *NM* - 23/03/2010 05:40:32 PM 360 Views
Unswear VS Still - 23/03/2010 11:31:18 PM 820 Views
Re: Doubt it. They were unbound for less than a minute - 24/03/2010 04:53:23 AM 698 Views
Re: so egwene had almost all the aes sedai loose and reswear the oaths - 24/03/2010 03:08:21 AM 731 Views
Re: so egwene had almost all the aes sedai loose and reswear the oaths - 24/03/2010 12:32:05 PM 667 Views
I had a related question about the oath rod: - 24/03/2010 10:07:52 AM 1071 Views
Non-channelers cannot use oath rod - 24/03/2010 12:04:53 PM 830 Views
Re: Non-channelers cannot use oath rod - 24/03/2010 03:26:43 PM 1014 Views
Too bad she didn't take the opportunity to drop the Oaths altogether. - 25/03/2010 02:14:32 PM 724 Views
Unthinkable - 25/03/2010 03:35:56 PM 717 Views
Agreed - 25/03/2010 07:30:46 PM 754 Views
Re: Agreed - 26/03/2010 04:51:18 PM 672 Views
yup - 27/03/2010 09:04:30 PM 597 Views
I disagree. The Oaths are among the least irritating of the many irritating things about Aes Sedai. - 27/03/2010 09:56:34 PM 656 Views
I'm with ya Templar. They have ways around everything. *NM* - 29/03/2010 06:07:00 AM 312 Views
Except when they're leashed to an a'dam *NM* - 29/03/2010 08:28:05 AM 292 Views
I would have loved it if Nynaeve, Egwene and Elayne went off and started their own organizations - 02/04/2010 06:04:30 PM 826 Views
well they're not the daughters of silence thats for sure - 11/04/2010 07:13:42 PM 633 Views
maybe a slight redo. - 11/04/2010 07:11:01 PM 612 Views
i thought - 31/03/2010 01:02:19 AM 614 Views

Reply to Message