Active Users:2521 Time:21/11/2025 12:22:42 AM
Unswear VS Still Nargs Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 11:31:18 PM
When an Aes Sedai is stilled or burned out they immediately lose the ageless look. However, when they are loosed of the oaths with the oath rod they retain their ageless look.

I suspect, though, the ageless look would disappear or wear off slowly over time.
Reply to message
so egwene had almost all the aes sedai loose and reswear the oaths - 23/03/2010 04:45:00 PM 1640 Views
Doubt it. They were unbound for less than a minute *NM* - 23/03/2010 05:40:32 PM 413 Views
Unswear VS Still - 23/03/2010 11:31:18 PM 939 Views
Re: Doubt it. They were unbound for less than a minute - 24/03/2010 04:53:23 AM 803 Views
Re: so egwene had almost all the aes sedai loose and reswear the oaths - 24/03/2010 03:08:21 AM 851 Views
Re: so egwene had almost all the aes sedai loose and reswear the oaths - 24/03/2010 12:32:05 PM 768 Views
I had a related question about the oath rod: - 24/03/2010 10:07:52 AM 1273 Views
Non-channelers cannot use oath rod - 24/03/2010 12:04:53 PM 962 Views
Re: Non-channelers cannot use oath rod - 24/03/2010 03:26:43 PM 1227 Views
Too bad she didn't take the opportunity to drop the Oaths altogether. - 25/03/2010 02:14:32 PM 832 Views
Unthinkable - 25/03/2010 03:35:56 PM 823 Views
Agreed - 25/03/2010 07:30:46 PM 867 Views
Re: Agreed - 26/03/2010 04:51:18 PM 784 Views
yup - 27/03/2010 09:04:30 PM 715 Views
I disagree. The Oaths are among the least irritating of the many irritating things about Aes Sedai. - 27/03/2010 09:56:34 PM 768 Views
I'm with ya Templar. They have ways around everything. *NM* - 29/03/2010 06:07:00 AM 368 Views
Except when they're leashed to an a'dam *NM* - 29/03/2010 08:28:05 AM 342 Views
I would have loved it if Nynaeve, Egwene and Elayne went off and started their own organizations - 02/04/2010 06:04:30 PM 938 Views
well they're not the daughters of silence thats for sure - 11/04/2010 07:13:42 PM 770 Views
maybe a slight redo. - 11/04/2010 07:11:01 PM 717 Views
i thought - 31/03/2010 01:02:19 AM 723 Views

Reply to Message