Active Users:687 Time:19/12/2024 01:18:37 AM
Unswear VS Still Nargs Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 11:31:18 PM
When an Aes Sedai is stilled or burned out they immediately lose the ageless look. However, when they are loosed of the oaths with the oath rod they retain their ageless look.

I suspect, though, the ageless look would disappear or wear off slowly over time.
Reply to message
so egwene had almost all the aes sedai loose and reswear the oaths - 23/03/2010 04:45:00 PM 1457 Views
Doubt it. They were unbound for less than a minute *NM* - 23/03/2010 05:40:32 PM 333 Views
Unswear VS Still - 23/03/2010 11:31:18 PM 757 Views
Re: Doubt it. They were unbound for less than a minute - 24/03/2010 04:53:23 AM 635 Views
Re: so egwene had almost all the aes sedai loose and reswear the oaths - 24/03/2010 03:08:21 AM 664 Views
Re: so egwene had almost all the aes sedai loose and reswear the oaths - 24/03/2010 12:32:05 PM 598 Views
I had a related question about the oath rod: - 24/03/2010 10:07:52 AM 998 Views
Non-channelers cannot use oath rod - 24/03/2010 12:04:53 PM 769 Views
Re: Non-channelers cannot use oath rod - 24/03/2010 03:26:43 PM 937 Views
Too bad she didn't take the opportunity to drop the Oaths altogether. - 25/03/2010 02:14:32 PM 656 Views
Unthinkable - 25/03/2010 03:35:56 PM 642 Views
Agreed - 25/03/2010 07:30:46 PM 674 Views
Re: Agreed - 26/03/2010 04:51:18 PM 619 Views
yup - 27/03/2010 09:04:30 PM 540 Views
I disagree. The Oaths are among the least irritating of the many irritating things about Aes Sedai. - 27/03/2010 09:56:34 PM 593 Views
I'm with ya Templar. They have ways around everything. *NM* - 29/03/2010 06:07:00 AM 283 Views
Except when they're leashed to an a'dam *NM* - 29/03/2010 08:28:05 AM 265 Views
I would have loved it if Nynaeve, Egwene and Elayne went off and started their own organizations - 02/04/2010 06:04:30 PM 752 Views
well they're not the daughters of silence thats for sure - 11/04/2010 07:13:42 PM 565 Views
maybe a slight redo. - 11/04/2010 07:11:01 PM 548 Views
i thought - 31/03/2010 01:02:19 AM 563 Views

Reply to Message