Active Users:608 Time:08/01/2026 11:28:06 AM
I wrote this post... Etzel Send a noteboard - 18/03/2010 05:41:47 PM
Because I often see people state or indicate that the Seanchan Prophecy would only be fulfilled if Rand is brought to the Crystal Throne ter'angreal or that Fortuona wants to bring Rand to the throne in Seandar. IMO, this wrong, Fortuona just wants that Rand bows to her, like e.g. Beslan did.

You are right that it would be an elegant way to explain the Seanchan Prophecy (whose exact wording we indeed don't know), if it meant that Rand will serve all humankind. On the other hand, by explicitly pointing out the differences between the Seanchan and the Westlands Prophecies, ironically even letting a Seanchan state that the Westland Prophecies must have been corrupted, it seems to me that the Seanchan/Tuon will have to realize at one point that their Prophecies are simply wrong propaganda and pledge themselves to Rand.
Reply to message
On the meaning of kneeling before the Crystal Throne - 18/03/2010 12:14:52 PM 3809 Views
Re: On the meaning of kneeling before the Crystal Throne - 18/03/2010 12:41:51 PM 942 Views
Well... - 18/03/2010 12:58:29 PM 952 Views
Re: Well... - 18/03/2010 02:19:12 PM 947 Views
Re: On the meaning of kneeling before the Crystal Throne - 18/03/2010 02:42:24 PM 1372 Views
Tuon's attack on WT... - 18/03/2010 02:54:14 PM 890 Views
Re: On the meaning of kneeling before the Crystal Throne - 18/03/2010 02:54:53 PM 899 Views
Re: On the meaning of kneeling before the Crystal Throne - 18/03/2010 10:41:12 PM 1029 Views
I wrote this post... - 18/03/2010 05:41:47 PM 889 Views
Re: I wrote this post... - 18/03/2010 10:00:58 PM 1012 Views
What about - 18/03/2010 04:55:10 PM 805 Views
Nice idea... - 18/03/2010 05:35:36 PM 853 Views
Re: Nice idea... - 19/03/2010 04:28:15 PM 775 Views
Re: What about - 18/03/2010 10:27:08 PM 860 Views
Re: On the meaning of kneeling before the Crystal Throne - 18/03/2010 06:53:17 PM 945 Views
I see this happening... - 18/03/2010 08:52:24 PM 869 Views
What if both turn out to be correct? - 19/03/2010 07:03:15 AM 836 Views

Reply to Message