Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
mogi67 Send a noteboard - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
I understand what you're saying (I think), but I would word it differently.
Ishamael's beliefs are, by our definition, evil.
Therefore, Ishamael is, by our definition, evil.
But, Ishamael doesn't believe he is evil, nor does he believe the DO is evil, nor does he believe in evil. He simply believes what he believes, and doesn't care about any arbitrary label of that belief as Good or Evil.
Ishamael's beliefs are, by our definition, evil.
Therefore, Ishamael is, by our definition, evil.
But, Ishamael doesn't believe he is evil, nor does he believe the DO is evil, nor does he believe in evil. He simply believes what he believes, and doesn't care about any arbitrary label of that belief as Good or Evil.
So you're suggesting that Nihilists are evil?
Ishamael's nature
- 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM
1844 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
- 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
885 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees.
- 01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM
959 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
- 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
704 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM
741 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics?
- 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
633 Views
Crap
- 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM
679 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are...
- 02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM
646 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM
662 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM
659 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
599 Views
I doubt that.
- 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
567 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
- 02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM
610 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM
679 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
638 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM
606 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland
- 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM
1058 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
- 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM
614 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
- 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM
568 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
- 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM
596 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
- 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM
601 Views
Because there is a Creator.
- 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM
540 Views
faulty assumptions
- 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM
550 Views
Impossible.
- 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM
551 Views
maybe an analogy will help
- 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
955 Views
- 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
955 Views
But therein lies the problem.
- 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM
534 Views
your own argument is self defeating
- 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM
567 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned.
- 11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM
571 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM*
- 12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM
252 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
- 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
533 Views
