Active Users:161 Time:19/04/2025 03:57:23 AM
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM

TGS (A Place to Begin) - "Is that what made you turn to his side?" Rand asked. "You were always so full of thoughts, Elan. Your logic destroyed you, didn't it?"

Was anyone struck by this statement?

I've always thought this was what snared Ishamael, and to see it written in plain text was striking to me. Ishamael is so intelligent and thinks everything through so deeply, that he arrives at conclusions that seem illogical. It's like someone who becomes hysterical when presented with 1+1, insisting that it's 2 instantly, whereas a brilliant mathematician has alternate theories.

In this same way, we all automatically know that the DO is evil, but Elan got caught up in complex philosophy. He's still caught up in it.

It's an interesting statement, and personifies Ishamael for me.


Is Ishamael really more intelligent than Aginor - the genius mad scientist? Or Graendal, the foremost psychologist in the world? Or Demandred, the man who has an IQ of 160 compared to Lews Therin's 170, according to RJ?

I don't necessarily think so. Ishamael is different because he is a theologian and philosopher. He looks at the world with different eyes and from a different perspective than the other super intelligent members of the Forsaken. This doesn't mean that he is smarter than them. It just means that his area of expertise happens to be most suitable to understanding the Dark One.

Aginor's specialist area is biology. Graendal's is psychology. Demandred's is leadership, military strategy and politics.

Ishamael's is the study of good and evil. Exactly what is needed to understand the Dark One. He may not understand biology as well as Aginor, the human mind as well as Graendal, political and military strategy as well as Demandred. But he understands the nature of good and evil better than anyone.

That's all.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1763 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 787 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 262 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 801 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees. - 01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM 866 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 633 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 656 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 553 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 618 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 611 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 535 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 509 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 480 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 479 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 568 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 518 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 672 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 491 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 476 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 569 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 556 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 609 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 550 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 530 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 494 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 478 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 877 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 545 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 539 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 538 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 483 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 482 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 467 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 461 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 466 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 461 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 879 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 460 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 488 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 467 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 217 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 206 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 546 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 612 Views

Reply to Message