Active Users:475 Time:19/12/2024 06:49:33 PM
I didn't get that at all NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 03/09/2009 12:04:57 PM
To me, the post reads like he can forsee potential delays even though he doesn't say so outright--from what I remember, we didn't get a similar post about TGS potentially taking longer than expected.

It's funny how two different people can read the same piece and come away with completely different viewpoints. I interpreted that blog post to mean that things are going pretty good, he feels refreshed etc etc but as in any long term project stuff can happen to cause setbacks. This is always the case with EVERY long term project, witness the CERN collider. I think he put that in to remind us of that. I think it will be super cool if he gets AMoLII out by Jan, giving us a year between books but to be truthful I've been more expecting 18 months between the books.

NaCl(in the end, after everything is said and done, lots more has been said than done)H2O
Reply to message
New blog post on Book 13 - 03/09/2009 11:49:10 AM 1087 Views
Some good info there - 03/09/2009 12:03:14 PM 572 Views
I didn't get that at all - 03/09/2009 12:04:57 PM 608 Views
Re: I didn't get that at all - 03/09/2009 12:12:04 PM 567 Views
Re: I didn't get that at all - 03/09/2009 02:21:01 PM 524 Views
Another curious thing - 03/09/2009 01:05:35 PM 646 Views
Nothing curious there. - 03/09/2009 02:46:23 PM 537 Views
Aha. So I was, in fact, misremembering. Thanks! - 03/09/2009 02:49:03 PM 523 Views
Re: New blog post on Book 13 - 03/09/2009 01:36:07 PM 537 Views
Re: New blog post on Book 13 - 03/09/2009 02:09:27 PM 518 Views
Re: New blog post on Book 13 - 03/09/2009 02:20:44 PM 566 Views
Some people have been speculating that it is Lan... - 03/09/2009 07:11:19 PM 533 Views
Come what may - 03/09/2009 07:20:41 PM 491 Views
Re: Some people have been speculating that it is Lan... - 03/09/2009 08:49:52 PM 479 Views
Re: New blog post on Book 13 - 03/09/2009 08:34:54 PM 638 Views

Reply to Message