Active Users:1328 Time:19/12/2024 11:17:12 AM
It's very simple darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 16/01/2010 06:17:36 PM

Could you please start at the beginning and tell me why a female Forsaken was involved in this scene?

From what I've read, and from Brandon's answers, SH arrived and did what he could and then he got Elza to go what he could not. It was those two alone.


Someone taught Elza AoL weaves enabling her to perform the tasks for SH, and someone figured out that she was under a Compulsion. We know SH in the past could not tell the difference between weaves so unless he's got a whole new array of abilities (which I acknowledge as possible), only one of the female Forsaken could have been responsible for Elza's knowledge.

Graendal is IMO the most likely since she's already in the area, is attached to Compulsion and was previously given orders to bring Rand pain ... this would seem like just another piece to that...
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Elza's Compulsion - 14/01/2010 08:41:04 PM 1890 Views
I think Graendal was involved on some level in this part of the story - 14/01/2010 09:12:05 PM 820 Views
I disagree - 14/01/2010 09:27:27 PM 675 Views
except work with Semirhage! - 14/01/2010 09:34:37 PM 604 Views
Well... - 14/01/2010 09:43:40 PM 675 Views
SH can't channel thus can't teach Elza anything *NM* - 14/01/2010 10:20:19 PM 239 Views
Yeah, but according to BS, he apparently could "give her the knowledge". *shrug* *NM* - 15/01/2010 07:16:22 AM 215 Views
that's your interpretation of the quote - 15/01/2010 05:58:30 PM 511 Views
This and the others quotes suggest that only SH and Elza were involved *NM* - 16/01/2010 09:51:24 AM 203 Views
As I said that's certainly one of of interpreting the quotes - 16/01/2010 03:46:55 PM 454 Views
The question is... - 16/01/2010 03:59:24 PM 470 Views
Re: The question is... - 16/01/2010 04:02:55 PM 449 Views
Yeah, as I said elsewhere, would be a nice question for BS, if there was another Forsaken. *NM* - 16/01/2010 04:08:05 PM 486 Views
I bet you anything he'd giva a big fat RAFO to that - 16/01/2010 04:08:58 PM 461 Views
BS spoke quite openly about this scene, though - 16/01/2010 04:16:09 PM 472 Views
always worth a try, but wasn't he asked to be less open recently? - 16/01/2010 04:31:54 PM 461 Views
Shaidar Haran can't channel. - 14/01/2010 09:34:51 PM 810 Views
I know... - 14/01/2010 09:45:15 PM 673 Views
I agree with you, for a related but slightly different reason ... - 14/01/2010 09:58:28 PM 753 Views
That doesn't prove anything... - 14/01/2010 10:07:46 PM 689 Views
It proves enough for me ... - 14/01/2010 10:26:28 PM 585 Views
Re: That doesn't prove anything... - 15/01/2010 11:03:05 AM 425 Views
not really - 15/01/2010 05:29:25 PM 475 Views
I don't understand your theory - 16/01/2010 05:08:03 PM 438 Views
It's very simple - 16/01/2010 06:17:36 PM 427 Views
So in other words - 17/01/2010 06:31:58 PM 546 Views
no I'd continue to insist that something disproved was correct - 17/01/2010 06:43:41 PM 442 Views
Re: no I'd continue to insist that something disproved was correct - 18/01/2010 04:48:33 AM 471 Views
I'm talking about implanting knowledge into someone elses head - 18/01/2010 05:37:32 AM 457 Views
Here's Brandon's one answer - 18/01/2010 05:20:20 PM 459 Views
But... - 18/01/2010 05:48:54 PM 454 Views
Exactly my point - 18/01/2010 06:24:25 PM 495 Views
But by this logic... - 18/01/2010 06:50:43 PM 457 Views
Yes... - 18/01/2010 07:00:40 PM 502 Views
While you are right... - 18/01/2010 08:44:19 PM 473 Views
as we've discussed in another thread - 18/01/2010 09:08:56 PM 848 Views
I mean... - 19/01/2010 02:21:39 PM 465 Views
Weren't they specifically called Weaves that haven't been seen since the AoL? - 19/01/2010 05:26:38 PM 485 Views
"Elza had been given knowledge of several rarely known weaves" is the quote. - 19/01/2010 06:14:22 PM 422 Views
Well if they were secret Ajah weaves someone would have recognized them *NM* - 19/01/2010 06:21:19 PM 214 Views
Maybe secret BA weaves... - 19/01/2010 06:37:42 PM 676 Views
Possible since she was the only BA in the area - 19/01/2010 06:40:38 PM 705 Views
See, I think there's reason for her presence to be kept secret... - 18/01/2010 09:10:43 PM 507 Views
I have a hard time... - 19/01/2010 02:17:52 PM 515 Views
I agree with you - 19/01/2010 04:45:59 PM 443 Views
and you may very well be correct - 19/01/2010 05:39:02 PM 664 Views
Yet Rand/LTT tells us only a few chapters later - 14/01/2010 10:27:57 PM 541 Views
Anything is possible ... - 14/01/2010 10:54:46 PM 538 Views
who knows - 14/01/2010 11:21:43 PM 508 Views
It's not all that convoluted, though ... - 15/01/2010 03:26:01 PM 443 Views
Cyndane/Moggy/Graendal it all amounts to the same in the end - 15/01/2010 05:57:10 PM 595 Views
Re: Cyndane/Moggy/Graendal it all amounts to the same in the end - 15/01/2010 06:25:32 PM 468 Views
Re: Cyndane/Moggy/Graendal it all amounts to the same in the end - 15/01/2010 06:44:26 PM 446 Views
Good point! - 15/01/2010 07:19:00 AM 526 Views
Re: Good point! - 15/01/2010 05:30:12 PM 421 Views
I agree - 16/01/2010 09:50:09 AM 408 Views
what doesn't make sense about this to me - 15/01/2010 06:04:45 PM 490 Views
Re: what doesn't make sense about this to me - 15/01/2010 06:29:59 PM 485 Views
damn double posting - 15/01/2010 07:04:56 PM 432 Views
As it is often the case... - 16/01/2010 09:30:56 AM 522 Views
go re-read my statements and quit putting words in my mouth please. - 16/01/2010 03:59:52 PM 481 Views
Well... - 16/01/2010 04:14:28 PM 383 Views
as I said it's also possible that SH has new abilities - 16/01/2010 04:33:30 PM 423 Views
Re: I think Graendal was involved on some level in this part of the story - 14/01/2010 09:30:53 PM 523 Views
Uhhh? - 14/01/2010 09:13:13 PM 670 Views
One point - 14/01/2010 09:20:09 PM 611 Views
Re: One point - 14/01/2010 09:32:00 PM 535 Views
Elza truly believes that... - 14/01/2010 09:38:35 PM 538 Views
Elza "found a reason to follow the Compulsion" - 14/01/2010 11:23:33 PM 579 Views
So, it came from her, and would not go when the Compulsion was removed. - 15/01/2010 05:56:32 AM 514 Views
fair enough - 16/01/2010 04:34:05 PM 558 Views
Not quite - 14/01/2010 09:38:45 PM 562 Views

Reply to Message