Active Users:486 Time:23/11/2024 06:37:36 PM
It had to be a circle of six men and six women... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 16/01/2010 03:18:16 AM
The BwB says explicitly that a circle of six men and six women, being the most balanced possible circle between men and women, was capable of doing some things no other circle could.

We're even told that a circle of 72 at times was weaker than a circle of 12, especially if it was not balanced well.

I assume that the precision advantage any mixed circle gives depends on the balance of the link. A circle of one man and one woman is quite capable of some things that two men and one woman or vice versa cannot do.

So, it seems that LTT did need just six women, and they had to be very strong.

Why not weaker women with angreal/sa'angreal? I think the circle leader had to shift through the operation, and then, one of the weaker women would be called upon to weave stuff, and due to lower dexterity and skill, they would have mucked it up.

Hence, he was left with no choice but to go for it with only men.
Reply to message
LTT and the bore. - 16/01/2010 02:50:34 AM 1347 Views
I think there is a scene in KoD or CoT - 16/01/2010 02:57:13 AM 649 Views
Re: I think there is a scene in KoD or CoT - 16/01/2010 03:23:14 AM 676 Views
I always thought the scene with Cadsuane an empty threat... - 16/01/2010 12:28:17 PM 569 Views
It had to be a circle of six men and six women... - 16/01/2010 03:18:16 AM 612 Views
there is no such thing as a circle of 6 and 6 - 16/01/2010 03:35:17 AM 525 Views
Re: It had to be a circle of six men and six women... - 16/01/2010 03:37:49 AM 596 Views
Here's the quote... - 16/01/2010 06:02:49 AM 648 Views
Re: Here's the quote... - 16/01/2010 04:00:11 PM 533 Views
Dude, you seem to not read what is written... - 16/01/2010 07:28:27 PM 545 Views
Hmm... - 18/01/2010 11:21:41 AM 480 Views
I think... - 16/01/2010 11:31:18 AM 641 Views
Re: I think... - 16/01/2010 01:27:40 PM 584 Views
In my view... - 16/01/2010 01:50:03 PM 454 Views
Re: In my view... - 16/01/2010 02:11:20 PM 458 Views
We know... - 16/01/2010 02:43:41 PM 573 Views
Its presented as fact - 16/01/2010 03:00:33 PM 463 Views
Here is a quote by RJ - 16/01/2010 03:10:28 PM 490 Views
Re: Here is a quote by RJ - 16/01/2010 03:26:13 PM 544 Views
In my opinion - 16/01/2010 03:51:02 PM 441 Views
RJ was as slippery as an AS! - 16/01/2010 04:31:02 PM 445 Views
Re: RJ was as slippery as an AS! - 18/01/2010 06:09:40 AM 415 Views
RJ could be tricky, true... - 19/01/2010 02:56:05 PM 422 Views
RJ changed his mind about a lot of stuff throughout the series - 22/01/2010 06:35:09 PM 461 Views
Re: We know... - 16/01/2010 03:17:54 PM 519 Views
It's in any case clear... - 16/01/2010 03:27:49 PM 423 Views
Re: It's in any case clear... - 16/01/2010 03:44:33 PM 464 Views
I don't think - 16/01/2010 03:56:25 PM 467 Views
The question is how many people were still alive? - 18/01/2010 06:19:49 AM 508 Views
Indeed. *NM* - 19/01/2010 02:47:58 PM 176 Views
Did you read my second post? *NM* - 16/01/2010 03:42:23 PM 291 Views
My Thoughts - 16/01/2010 09:43:33 PM 455 Views
The women needed to balance the men - 18/01/2010 12:12:27 PM 503 Views
What if Rand usesTP to off the DO? - 22/01/2010 05:54:13 PM 445 Views

Reply to Message