Active Users:917 Time:19/12/2024 12:54:49 AM
Not sure, but the discussion might be saved somewhere (maybe in my e-mail somehow) RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 14/01/2010 07:12:42 PM
They describe them pretty often in the books - they are a little larger than palm sized. And they actually seem to add weight to whatever is converted, regardless of the original material.

But, if memory serves, the discussion revolved around three main points:
1) Converting something to cuendillar melds it into a single item, so the harbor chain links became one massive construct rather than articulated links as it originally was. This would make it a problem to create cuendillar armor, since you'd need to convert the links before trying to create mail out of it.
2) The weight issue, which again, seems pretty legitimate in lieu of the fact that if a bunch of warriors are walking around with heavy masses of cuendillar as shields, they are no longer agile to keep up with changing battlefield conditions, and become actually more vulnerable to attack since their movement has been reduced
3) The necessary Talent to mass-produce them seems to depend on a combination of factors that were not easy for the Aes Sedai of the Tower to produce; only a couple of women in the rebel camp had any ability to convert an object to cuendillar without strain and of them, Egwene was by far the mightiest with an affinity for Earth and ability to use the weave in a large scale - thus only one women out of more than a thousand had an ability to produce it in enough amounts to come close to mass production, which seems overly limiting.

Basically, it seems like a great idea on paper, but the properties of cuendillar made it so that even during the Age of Legends, using it for this purpose was not an option, even while they used it for other, smaller things in common use.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Cuendillar and Perpetual Gateways - 14/01/2010 03:32:15 PM 1524 Views
I'm still not sure if cuendillar would be "destroyed" or "remain" - 14/01/2010 03:55:00 PM 711 Views
well I think you've discovered something even more important - 14/01/2010 05:00:11 PM 740 Views
I love it... - 14/01/2010 06:23:59 PM 613 Views
exactly! *NM* - 14/01/2010 06:50:19 PM 310 Views
Quick question ... - 15/01/2010 01:34:21 AM 724 Views
No - cuendillar just gets stronger the more powerful a force you use against it - 15/01/2010 07:55:34 PM 623 Views
Re: Cuendillar and Perpetual Gateways - 14/01/2010 04:42:37 PM 666 Views
Cuendillar shields - 14/01/2010 04:57:45 PM 710 Views
Wasn't the consensus... - 14/01/2010 05:04:50 PM 718 Views
Really? - 14/01/2010 05:30:40 PM 626 Views
Re: Really? - 14/01/2010 05:52:45 PM 595 Views
Alright. - 14/01/2010 06:25:27 PM 555 Views
Even so... - 14/01/2010 06:30:35 PM 657 Views
Not sure, but the discussion might be saved somewhere (maybe in my e-mail somehow) - 14/01/2010 07:12:42 PM 769 Views
Lack of Creativity / Flame - 14/01/2010 07:31:32 PM 685 Views
let's do some quick math to see how feasible this is... - 15/01/2010 12:16:02 AM 532 Views
Again, Lack of Creativity - 15/01/2010 12:54:01 AM 570 Views
right cause they are full of new ideas in WoT! - 15/01/2010 12:57:52 AM 540 Views
Huh? Are you saying that... - 15/01/2010 01:49:23 AM 565 Views
It's not just a matter of creativity - 15/01/2010 03:42:38 AM 652 Views
Are you trying to be funny? - 15/01/2010 09:22:18 AM 620 Views
I think what people are saying to you (at least what I am saying) - 15/01/2010 07:58:31 PM 723 Views
What I am telling you all (at least telling you) - 15/01/2010 08:12:32 PM 525 Views
I disagree with part of that - 15/01/2010 08:17:30 PM 853 Views
The vast majority of WoT folk aren't particularly innovative - 15/01/2010 08:02:52 PM 541 Views
Pretty much. I think their religion is not doing anything helpful with the Power. - 15/01/2010 09:13:49 PM 519 Views
Mail is obviously out of the question... - 15/01/2010 12:54:32 AM 638 Views
realistically the timeframes involved to make even the shields - 15/01/2010 01:03:30 AM 626 Views
Kind of disagree. - 15/01/2010 01:37:42 AM 592 Views
We agree... maybe? - 15/01/2010 09:27:32 AM 602 Views
both - 15/01/2010 08:00:26 PM 516 Views
Please explain - 15/01/2010 09:29:29 AM 610 Views
not saying mail... - 14/01/2010 07:33:06 PM 544 Views
hey look! someone with creativity! - 15/01/2010 09:30:29 AM 668 Views
Cuendillar dragons are great... - 14/01/2010 06:45:12 PM 609 Views
Create a ter'angreal that can open gateways wherever it is pointed and triggered. - 14/01/2010 04:59:28 PM 570 Views
Maybe this was one of the violent games played for sport during The Collapse *NM* - 14/01/2010 05:14:05 PM 267 Views
Without a doubt *NM* - 14/01/2010 05:26:42 PM 273 Views
Or they could just tie the gateway weave off, like Sammael did in CoS, and Rand did in KoD... - 14/01/2010 07:11:56 PM 765 Views
Thanks; I thought this was the case but couldnt recall the sections. - 14/01/2010 07:13:32 PM 534 Views
True... I forgot... - 14/01/2010 07:18:25 PM 627 Views
Tied-off weaves dont last forever - 14/01/2010 07:39:53 PM 574 Views
No... - 14/01/2010 07:48:38 PM 635 Views
Correct. Q&A answer below regarding this. - 14/01/2010 09:08:02 PM 640 Views
Bingo - 14/01/2010 08:25:12 PM 585 Views
Refrigerators and aqueducts and more... Air Conditioning! - 14/01/2010 07:49:12 PM 648 Views
Is a gateway fixed in place? - 14/01/2010 07:55:20 PM 625 Views

Reply to Message