more like a touch hypocritical, but since she accepted her part in the blame I'm not sure that works either.
Certainly a little bitchy though!
Certainly a little bitchy though!
I actually considered for some time, what word I should use and finally chose deceitful, though I agree that this word doesn't fit 100 % with what I really want to express. It's certainly clever from her, but somehow still seems a bit false to me that this insight suddenly comes from Egwene when it's convenient for.
As I already suggested in the past, I also believe that Egwene will argue that the Law of War shall remain, since the WT is still in war with the Shadow (and with the Seanchan), thus giving her more power.
Was Egwene wrong to berate both Halls after the reunification?
- 12/01/2010 05:13:59 PM
6892 Views
She was right, as long as she never mentions it again
- 12/01/2010 05:19:38 PM
789 Views
I didn't expect it, but it was absolutely the right thing for her to do.
- 12/01/2010 06:13:42 PM
788 Views
She was absolutely right and I love to hear good beratings.
- 12/01/2010 06:49:56 PM
747 Views
Like you'd say anything else. *NM*
- 13/01/2010 04:22:13 AM
295 Views
Like you'd say anything else. *NM*
- 13/01/2010 04:22:13 AM
295 Views
If the berating sucked, I would have complained. But it was pretty good to hear/read. *NM*
- 13/01/2010 04:33:29 PM
337 Views
Re: Was Egwene wrong to berate both Halls after the reunification?
- 12/01/2010 06:58:40 PM
719 Views
Reasonable in terms of power politics, but still somewhat deceitful.
- 12/01/2010 07:06:33 PM
757 Views
I'm not sure deceitful is the right word for the circumstances
- 12/01/2010 07:10:57 PM
793 Views
Yeah.. 
- 12/01/2010 07:23:11 PM
665 Views
- 12/01/2010 07:23:11 PM
665 Views
Re: Was Egwene wrong to berate both Halls after the reunification?
- 12/01/2010 07:20:30 PM
775 Views
I doubt it.
- 12/01/2010 09:58:40 PM
665 Views
It was a political move. It was the right political move, but not "morally" right.
- 12/01/2010 08:03:27 PM
686 Views
It was very clear where her sympathies lie. A lot of it was superficial.
- 12/01/2010 10:41:09 PM
801 Views
She didn't mention/berate the 300+ AS who ignored this whole facade of a plotline.
- 13/01/2010 01:27:02 AM
685 Views
it's not like they were there to berate! *NM*
- 13/01/2010 04:10:49 AM
273 Views
Wait until they come back and she slams them for "ignoring the Tower in its hour of need." *NM*
- 13/01/2010 04:20:55 AM
277 Views
She should
- 13/01/2010 04:22:13 AM
739 Views
They probably had more important matters than the privileges of a tiny group of powerful women.
- 14/01/2010 12:11:04 AM
691 Views
right, they were very very busy doing a whole lot of nothing
- 14/01/2010 12:13:06 AM
625 Views
Keeping an eye on the transition between rulers of the most powerful country IS more important
- 18/01/2010 12:19:17 PM
807 Views
they've been coming and going for months ... with no indication of what they are really up too
- 19/01/2010 06:24:27 AM
654 Views
What part of "keeping an eye on" suggests action or interference?
- 22/01/2010 01:38:52 PM
652 Views
It depends what she does next. It was really a tactical thing and politics can excuse the hypocrisy
- 13/01/2010 04:20:06 AM
752 Views