Regardless of whether her behaviour was acceptable or not, this:
Egwene was the one who caused the Salidar camp to declare war on Elaida, and she was the one who besieged Tar Valon and the White Tower. To say that she had no part in the rebellion is simply false.
2. Egwene is not a hypocrite because she isn't truly part of the Salidar camp. She was not present during the breaking of the Tower and played absolutely no part in it. She did not organize a rebellion against Elaida and she was forced into her position under the penalty of stilling. She therefore has the right to berate the Salidar Hall.
Egwene was the one who caused the Salidar camp to declare war on Elaida, and she was the one who besieged Tar Valon and the White Tower. To say that she had no part in the rebellion is simply false.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Was Egwene wrong to berate both Halls after the reunification?
- 12/01/2010 05:13:59 PM
6797 Views
She was right, as long as she never mentions it again
- 12/01/2010 05:19:38 PM
723 Views
I didn't expect it, but it was absolutely the right thing for her to do.
- 12/01/2010 06:13:42 PM
709 Views
She was absolutely right and I love to hear good beratings.
- 12/01/2010 06:49:56 PM
663 Views
Like you'd say anything else. *NM*
- 13/01/2010 04:22:13 AM
267 Views
Like you'd say anything else. *NM*
- 13/01/2010 04:22:13 AM
267 Views
If the berating sucked, I would have complained. But it was pretty good to hear/read. *NM*
- 13/01/2010 04:33:29 PM
303 Views
Re: Was Egwene wrong to berate both Halls after the reunification?
- 12/01/2010 06:58:40 PM
633 Views
Reasonable in terms of power politics, but still somewhat deceitful.
- 12/01/2010 07:06:33 PM
684 Views
One of your reasons is simply wrong.
- 12/01/2010 07:16:56 PM
680 Views
Re: Was Egwene wrong to berate both Halls after the reunification?
- 12/01/2010 07:20:30 PM
730 Views
I doubt it.
- 12/01/2010 09:58:40 PM
590 Views
It was a political move. It was the right political move, but not "morally" right.
- 12/01/2010 08:03:27 PM
612 Views
It was very clear where her sympathies lie. A lot of it was superficial.
- 12/01/2010 10:41:09 PM
715 Views
She didn't mention/berate the 300+ AS who ignored this whole facade of a plotline.
- 13/01/2010 01:27:02 AM
609 Views
it's not like they were there to berate! *NM*
- 13/01/2010 04:10:49 AM
244 Views
Wait until they come back and she slams them for "ignoring the Tower in its hour of need." *NM*
- 13/01/2010 04:20:55 AM
250 Views
She should
- 13/01/2010 04:22:13 AM
651 Views
They probably had more important matters than the privileges of a tiny group of powerful women.
- 14/01/2010 12:11:04 AM
617 Views
right, they were very very busy doing a whole lot of nothing
- 14/01/2010 12:13:06 AM
546 Views
Keeping an eye on the transition between rulers of the most powerful country IS more important
- 18/01/2010 12:19:17 PM
725 Views
they've been coming and going for months ... with no indication of what they are really up too
- 19/01/2010 06:24:27 AM
581 Views
What part of "keeping an eye on" suggests action or interference?
- 22/01/2010 01:38:52 PM
584 Views
It depends what she does next. It was really a tactical thing and politics can excuse the hypocrisy
- 13/01/2010 04:20:06 AM
680 Views