Active Users:1082 Time:23/11/2024 08:12:50 AM
Is Rand logical when he estimates female danger? Sidious Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 03:34:05 PM
LOC (Gifts) - In the mirror his head tilted as if he was listening, and he nodded, voice dropping to a murmur. “Yes, I can handle three, if they aren’t too strong… Of course, if one of them is Moghedien in a wig, or Semirhage, I may be in trouble.”

What do you really think of this statement?

Technically any of the following could be true...

1. One of the women could be as strong as the Forsaken. Rand plays a huge gamble by assuming that no one in the Tower is a high level channeler. It's even more likely that a woman of that strength would be sent after him if they decided to take him. One of them could have been Nynaeve or Sharina, for instance.

2. The women could have angreal or sa'angreal. This is even more likely considering the precautions the Tower would take if they sent a group of women to trap him. "Take Vora's sa'angreal along and capture al'Thor, Galina"

3. They could send one woman into the room and have the other thirteen in a circle outside. The range of a circle doesn't seem to be that limited. She could probably still wield the full power of the circle even if they were outside.

In the end it comes down to risks, I guess. Rand can't hide away from Aes Sedai all the time on the off-chance that the emissary is covered in sa'angreal. He's probably reasonably sure that he can handle three women in most situations. Taim is even more dismissive of facing three women. Maybe he's stupid though - Elayne is a very strong woman and even worse, she has a turtle angreal. He might have found himself in for a nasty surprise.

If you were a high strength male, how would you agree to meet groups of potentially threatening females? Would you meet any group of less than thirteen? Would you also stop at three or scoff at three?
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Is Rand logical when he estimates female danger? - 07/01/2010 03:34:05 PM 1428 Views
Basically you have to be ready for anything! - 07/01/2010 03:45:31 PM 780 Views
Yep. Send Daigian in Linked with 12 of her buddies (one of whom is holding an angreal) & hes screwed - 07/01/2010 05:19:03 PM 996 Views
Miscommunication seems to be a major theme of the series *NM* - 07/01/2010 07:17:16 PM 394 Views
As well as missed opportunities. - 07/01/2010 09:27:56 PM 705 Views
yes, the Amyrlin story line could have been wrapped up much earlier! - 07/01/2010 09:55:30 PM 811 Views
Yeah, I really wish his vision had been pushed. - 07/01/2010 10:16:15 PM 639 Views
ROFL - 08/01/2010 01:01:03 AM 614 Views
Re: ROFL - 08/01/2010 02:43:50 PM 653 Views
For a major theme, it sure is surprising - 08/01/2010 04:10:22 AM 694 Views
really? miscommunication seems to be woven into just about every sentence - 08/01/2010 04:53:48 AM 633 Views
Re: really? miscommunication seems to be woven into just about every sentence - 08/01/2010 04:10:04 PM 724 Views
Re: Is Rand logical when he estimates female danger? - 07/01/2010 03:48:14 PM 815 Views
Thanks for pointing to that Taim incident... its another proof... - 07/01/2010 04:15:33 PM 773 Views
I always like to think that Egwene, Elayne and Aviendha Linked can match Rand. - 07/01/2010 05:26:35 PM 702 Views
Those three... - 07/01/2010 05:35:24 PM 675 Views
I think this is probably close - 07/01/2010 07:19:40 PM 828 Views
- 07/01/2010 08:51:15 PM 850 Views
HA! - 07/01/2010 09:01:14 PM 795 Views
Re: HA! - 08/01/2010 11:37:06 AM 823 Views
Re: HA! - 08/01/2010 04:21:01 PM 628 Views
d'oh ... you've got him there - 08/01/2010 05:35:15 PM 565 Views
Hmm... - 09/01/2010 03:02:04 PM 614 Views
Re: Hmm... - 09/01/2010 04:47:05 PM 737 Views
Re: Hmm... - 09/01/2010 05:06:06 PM 729 Views
as we've discussed in the past, it's very loose - 09/01/2010 06:20:26 PM 827 Views
Re: as we've discussed in the past, it's very loose - 09/01/2010 07:32:57 PM 2956 Views
Re: as we've discussed in the past, it's very loose - 09/01/2010 09:05:01 PM 813 Views
Re: as we've discussed in the past, it's very loose - 09/01/2010 09:15:32 PM 955 Views
Re: as we've discussed in the past, it's very loose - 10/01/2010 02:06:09 AM 764 Views
There are issues, of course! - 09/01/2010 06:17:08 PM 933 Views
Re: There are issues, of course! - 09/01/2010 07:18:03 PM 886 Views
I think I fall in between you guys - 09/01/2010 08:46:58 PM 817 Views
Getting tired of this merry go round, but here we go again... - 07/01/2010 09:08:59 PM 726 Views
Don't get on it! It causes insanity. - 07/01/2010 09:29:15 PM 635 Views
d'uh - 07/01/2010 09:57:30 PM 723 Views
For the last time! - 07/01/2010 09:50:16 PM 898 Views
it's about EFFECTIVE strength Fionwe (jk) - 07/01/2010 10:05:48 PM 591 Views
I don't think they were that bad back then, but still... - 07/01/2010 10:11:46 PM 706 Views
and he's gone out of his way IMO to show that it's a stupid - 07/01/2010 10:41:03 PM 762 Views
Re: I don't think they were that bad back then, but still... - 08/01/2010 11:38:48 AM 624 Views
I'd actually go with Elayne in matters of battle. - 08/01/2010 02:47:34 PM 733 Views
Wow, I wasn't expecting that - 08/01/2010 02:55:53 PM 815 Views
I'm not too impressed with the Forsaken so far. - 08/01/2010 03:30:43 PM 635 Views
I'm tempted to go with Taim too, but... - 08/01/2010 04:25:52 PM 679 Views
If Elayne had wanted Taim dead, he and his minions would have been dead - 08/01/2010 05:41:29 PM 729 Views
The reverse would be true too, though... - 08/01/2010 05:50:02 PM 639 Views
But she just heard Taim say to basically stand down - 08/01/2010 06:05:43 PM 691 Views
But... - 08/01/2010 08:53:11 PM 890 Views
Ah but Elayne also knew they knew Rand wouldn't allow it - 08/01/2010 10:40:45 PM 740 Views
That whole lack of communication thing made my eye twitch. - 08/01/2010 11:00:25 PM 750 Views
or just painfully stupid! - 08/01/2010 11:10:37 PM 573 Views
Re: But... - 10/01/2010 03:20:12 AM 746 Views
Re: Is Rand logical when he estimates female danger? - 07/01/2010 05:13:48 PM 628 Views
I think he is illogical towards all danger, regardless of gender. - 07/01/2010 06:39:37 PM 642 Views
It's all kind of irrelevant. - 08/01/2010 11:28:46 PM 905 Views

Reply to Message