Active Users:361 Time:04/04/2025 12:06:29 AM
I concede Datakim Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
Well. I was reading the book trying to come up with another argument for Fanatic-Templar, and I just realised something. I think I totally messed everything up here.

My original idea was based on two fronts.

1. Rand was right that the people that Graendal had compulsed were so braindead that for all intents and purposes they were not alive at all and the only one truly alive there was Graendal. The rest were zombies. I think that this still has merit.

2. LTT/Rand was still sane enough at the point the balefiring happened that he would have been carefull to use a minimum amount of force. If there was a chance to destroy the pattern, he would not have done it. And also that having LTT memories would mean that he would know exactly how much damage the pattern could take, better than anyone. So essentially no balefire atrocity.

However, upon re-reading the book, I just realised that the balefire incident happened a lot later in the books than I thought it did. I thought it happened relatively early, before Rand started agreeing with LTT that death was preferable. It did not. It happened very near the end.

This causes the floor to drop entirely from my argument. There is no reason to assume that the totally suicidal Rand that he already is at this point would be especially carefull with Balefire. He is more Moridin than TwoRivers!Rand already.

So I admit, I was probably wrong about the whole balefire thing and that those who argued with me about that are right and that it was indeed a crazy atrocity.

Damnit.
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1583 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 984 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 979 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1008 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 909 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 822 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 941 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 853 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 821 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 776 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 763 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 731 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 759 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 740 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 898 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 806 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 865 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 746 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 842 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 780 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 773 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 766 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 876 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 889 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 805 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 917 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 725 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 765 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 406 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 794 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 795 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 763 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 443 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 741 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 376 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 751 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 727 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 859 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 777 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 814 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 812 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 795 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 794 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 816 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 774 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 823 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 712 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 803 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 782 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 794 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 808 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 750 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 822 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 754 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 695 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 873 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 808 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 782 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 742 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 798 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 706 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 731 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 883 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 729 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 735 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 813 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 756 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 786 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 868 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 735 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 738 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 803 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 741 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 887 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 840 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 794 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 829 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 724 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 830 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 769 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 817 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 740 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 814 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 973 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1082 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 706 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 751 Views

Reply to Message