Active Users:1088 Time:23/11/2024 08:49:35 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead? darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
The way it reads sounds like it could take a lot of time after someone's death to secure the right body... so unless it's a journey that takes months after your death I'm thinking Balefire shouldn't really make all that much difference.


Umm no, DO keeps your soul in his grasp, maybe inside the bore while waiting for a body to be secured. But the initial capture of the soul has to happen quickly. However, once the DO has your soul in his grasp, he can keep it from escaping to join the pattern.

So to continue my example. If he captured you in those 2 minutes, he could then keep your soul in his hand for years if he wanted to, he would not need to find a body in the remaining 3 minutes. But if he missed that 5 minute window, nothing could be done.


does not compute
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? Datakim - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1514 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. Fanatic-Templar - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 917 Views
On Balefire Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 919 Views
Good point Datakim - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 940 Views
On the nature of BaleFire Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 846 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. Datakim - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 758 Views
Wait! Datakim - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 881 Views
Re: Wait! callandor1000 - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 785 Views
Re: Wait! Datakim - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 757 Views
Re: Wait! callandor1000 - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 694 Views
Re: Wait! Datakim - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 725 Views
I disagree Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 697 Views
Re: I disagree Datakim - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 697 Views
Re: I disagree Lord Haart - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 678 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Fanatic-Templar - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 832 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Datakim - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 752 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Fanatic-Templar - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 790 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Datakim - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 676 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Fanatic-Templar - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 759 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Datakim - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 710 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Fanatic-Templar - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 696 Views
I agree with Templar Lord Haart - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 701 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM 1191 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. Fanatic-Templar - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 794 Views
Rand crossed a line Etzel - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 827 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line Datakim - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 736 Views
But... Etzel - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 846 Views
Re: But... Datakim - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 666 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 700 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* Etzel - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 380 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 730 Views
What? Datakim - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 730 Views
Where did you get that? Gher - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 698 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* Fanatic-Templar - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 414 Views
LOL ... super-death! darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 681 Views
Hah! *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 333 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 677 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 655 Views
Yes it was. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 821 Views
Re: Yes it was. Datakim - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 718 Views
Re: Yes it was. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 722 Views
Re: Yes it was. Datakim - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 742 Views
let me ask the question in a different way darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 733 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way Datakim - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 724 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 753 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts Datakim - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 699 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead? darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM 681 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead? Datakim - 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM 664 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 766 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? Datakim - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 642 Views
you are kidding right? darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 730 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 721 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. Datakim - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 730 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 743 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. Datakim - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 684 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 751 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. Datakim - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 689 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 633 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 807 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. Datakim - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 736 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 706 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: Sidious - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 665 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: RugbyPlayingAshaman - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 726 Views
What might work... Etzel - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 664 Views
Re: What might work... Datakim - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 667 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again Itachi - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 821 Views
Meh Datakim - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 660 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 675 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! Datakim - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 746 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 681 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 725 Views
*laughs behind hand* darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 796 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! Datakim - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 665 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 666 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing Datakim - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 739 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 674 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing Datakim - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 817 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 775 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. Datakim - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 733 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 763 Views
I concede Datakim - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 657 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. Cannoli - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 762 Views
Tee hee. Fanatic-Templar - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 708 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, Nyrende - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 744 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 670 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention Cannoli - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 744 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention Lord Haart - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 909 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention Cannoli - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1005 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 641 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. Cannoli - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 689 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM 751 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do. Cannoli - 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM 659 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules darius_sedai - 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM 955 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ... amirebram - 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM 701 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes