Active Users:322 Time:04/04/2025 01:03:40 AM
Re: Wait! Datakim Send a noteboard - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM

In the AoL, men and women linked together and as such, would have linked, likely with angreal and sa'angreal to create such a stream of balefire. From what the books imply, the amount of power used determines how large the beam of balefire will be.


Irrelevant. If a link of 72 could match the power offered by the CK, there would never have been a need to construct them, and the AS could have used a link to create the barrier they were intending to use the CK for.

CK was created at the end of the war, after the whole balefire thing. This means that when those cities were balefired, LESS power was used than CK at maximum.

It seems to me then, that if the power was directly connected to the width of the destruction area, to destroy a city of 100K people would have required a truly humongous amount of power. More than the AoLers had available.

I mean when Rand, the most powerfull channeler, using an angreal creates the most powerfull balefirestream he can, its about the thickness of a man. A meter or so maybe? How big is a city of 100K. Many kilometers certainly. If the only way to increase the thickness of the bar is extra strength. and the most powerfull channeler, with an angreal could only create a bar meter thick, imagine the sheer immense power required to do one several kilometers thick to wipe out a city in a single blow.

So it seems likely to me that there is a way to create a balefire bar that destroyes things in a large area, but only burns things back a short time. Essentially, this strongly implies that a skilled channeler can alter the form of the balefire. It can be a spear directed at a single target with most of the strength in it going to burn the target backwards as much as possible. Or it can be a sort of weapon of mass destruction, where the strength is added to the area effected, while lessening the time the threads burn backwards.

Given that, the most likely explanation to me was that Rand, using LTT knowledge did just that. He used the CK to create a beam wide enough to erase the whole of the palace at a single blow, but still kept the total strength level low to miminize the damage to the pattern.

I should also say that if the pattern could survive the instant annihilation of hundred thousand people at a single instant, how bad could the deaths of 300 people truly be? Adds more credence to the idea that Rand, with LTT's memories knows far better how much the pattern can take than Cadsuane or any other AS.

Seems clear to me, though I do admit that I am pretty tired and going to bed now. Hopefully this will still make sense to me in the morning.

Goodnight all!
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1584 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 985 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 979 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1008 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 910 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 822 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 941 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 854 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 822 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 776 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 763 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 732 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 759 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 741 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 898 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 807 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 866 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 747 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 842 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 780 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 773 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 766 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 876 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 890 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 805 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 917 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 725 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 766 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 406 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 794 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 796 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 764 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 443 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 741 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 376 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 751 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 728 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 860 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 778 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 815 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 812 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 795 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 794 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 817 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 774 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 824 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 713 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 803 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 782 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 795 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 809 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 750 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 823 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 754 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 695 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 874 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 808 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 783 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 742 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 799 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 707 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 731 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 884 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 729 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 736 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 813 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 756 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 786 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 868 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 736 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 738 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 803 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 742 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 888 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 841 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 794 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 829 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 724 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 831 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 770 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 817 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 740 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 815 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 974 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1083 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 707 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 751 Views

Reply to Message