Nynaeve's boat in aCoS proves nothing. It moved back a hundred paces because the oarsmen were balefired.
If the boat had a thread, one part of it being balefired would have meant the whole boat would be balefired. That did not happen.
I'm sure that the coat scene in tGS was a mistake, and BS was mistaken when he said objects had threads.
If the boat had a thread, one part of it being balefired would have meant the whole boat would be balefired. That did not happen.
I'm sure that the coat scene in tGS was a mistake, and BS was mistaken when he said objects had threads.
That is what I always thought. Though to be fair, that does not quite explain why it is that the boat was suddenly underwater. The way the whole thing works is that when Moghedien balefired the oarsmen, the boat should indeed have jumped back to the point where the men stopped rowing. but the boat itself should still have been afloat at that point and only started sinking then and there.
However the boat actually disappears and then appears already sinking and hits the bottom of the river almost at once. The only explanation I have is that there was something wrong with the boat that would have caused it to sink (a leak) but one of the oarsmen noticed it and fixed it. But when the oarsman was balefired, the problem was not fixed and the boat had sunk. But I figure thats a poor explanation. The whole thing is strange and inconsistent.
.... Wait a minute. If the oarsmen were balefired, then the boat would not have been moving as fast, which means it would have been further up(down?) the river, which means it should not have been there for Moghedien to balefire in the first place.
ARGH!
I will say that what BS says is a bit strange too. He says that a stone in the wall has a thread. Ok. But what happens if you take that stone, and cut it in two. Does the thread split suddenly, creating two threads. Or what? And why is it that the stone has a single thread rather than being composed of countless millions of tiny threads for each particular molecule that makes up the stone.
If the stone has a thread, what happens if you blow it to a million tiny pieces. Does the pattern suddenly create a million new threads from thin air?
Maybe that is how Rand will seal the DO. He will just take a big rock (with a single thread) and blow it to pieces at Shayol Ghul, creating many many millions of new threads from all the fragmented pieces and these newly created threads will then proceed to knit the hole in the pattern shut, repairing the bore.
Yeah.
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?)
05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM
- 2295 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?)
05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM
- 1059 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?)
05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM
- 927 Views
Nynaeve's boat...
05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM
- 889 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing.
05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM
- 775 Views
Good point ...
05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM
- 747 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads.
05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM
- 4479 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads.
05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM
- 717 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads.
05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM
- 741 Views
There is another way...
05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM
- 729 Views
Nope
06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM
- 765 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself...
06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM
- 884 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves?
06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM
- 707 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion?
06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM
- 742 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little
06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM
- 648 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted?
07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM
- 599 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM*
05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM
- 371 Views
I think she's alive.
06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM
- 696 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it?
06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM
- 773 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer
06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM
- 748 Views
perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves!
06/01/2010 11:06:49 PM
- 682 Views
Re: perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves!
07/01/2010 03:42:17 PM
- 720 Views