Active Users:337 Time:05/04/2025 02:16:56 AM
Clearly dead Etzel Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM
RJ came up with this "elegant" and quick way to get rid of the clever Graendal by Rand's use of brute force. I really don't see what the point would be, if Graendal somehow managed to survive, is still around and Rand has to come up with an even better idea to outsmart Graendal. Seems like a pointless twist, which further burdens the plot.

Graendal's PoV in the prologue also wasn't redundant, because it gave us e.g. more clues about Moridin's plans and situation. It also explains why Graendal didn't dare to immediately flee from Arad Doman, when Rand arrived. She had to stay and make contact with him eventually.

BS indicated as well that Graendal is dead by saying that she will just be mentioned a few times in ToM, and that ToM will make it clear, if she is dead.

Besides this, Semirhage's and Elza's ter'angreal bracelets remained, when Rand hit them with balefire on the chest. Considering this one wonders, if Graendal's angreal was even balefired, since Rand just aimed at the palace.
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2371 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1127 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 989 Views
Nynaeve's boat... - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 959 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 839 Views
Good point ... - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 810 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4543 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 794 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 813 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 731 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 762 Views
BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 781 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 754 Views
There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 800 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 835 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 751 Views
Nope - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 833 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 950 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 776 Views
Exactly! *NM* - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 412 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 800 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 715 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 661 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 978 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 821 Views
Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 833 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 810 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 407 Views
Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 981 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 847 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 797 Views
I think... - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 803 Views
No way. - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 876 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 745 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 783 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 397 Views
She's dead as dead gets. - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 721 Views
Dead is my bet - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 747 Views
She's dead *NM* - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 378 Views
Dead. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 381 Views
I think she's alive. - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 762 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 844 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 813 Views
What if.. - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 721 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 737 Views
Well... - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 951 Views

Reply to Message