Active Users:1212 Time:23/11/2024 07:08:59 AM
You're really splitting hairs... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 01/01/2010 04:06:02 PM

Aes Sedai is a Title, and it means "Servant of All." "Sedai" is an honorific... but I am splitting hairs.

Yup.
Either way, taking a word and making it a proper noun does not change the meaning, other than making it more specific. "God" refers to a specific deity, but "god" is more general.

That is true in English.

Yes, the same word can have different meanings depending on its context, but with the context it becomes quite specific.

What does this even mean? After the word's meaning is modified by context, it becomes unmodifiable?
"Ashan'darei" means sword spear, and we know that adding an "n" at the end of words is a general pluralizing tool in the OT, Asha'man, therefor should mean "Sword something " provided we knew what the word "man" meant in the OT. We are told, however, that Asha'man means guardian. The adding of a clause or a modifier changes the meaning of an established word. The lack of a modifier should not do so.

Why shouldn't it? We've been told repeatedly that context changes everything.

Moiraine took a sip of wine. “The Old Tongue is often difficult to translate.” Egwene stared at her. The Old Tongue? What about the rings, the ter’angreal? But Moiraine went blithely on. “Tel’aran’rhiod means the World of Dreams, or perhaps the Unseen World. Neither is really exact; it is more complex than that.
Aan’allein. One Man, but also The Man Who Is an Entire People, and two or three other ways to translate it as well. And the words we have taken for common use, and never think of their meanings in the Old Tongue. Warders are called ‘Gaidin,’ which was ‘brothers to battle.’ Aes Sedai meant ‘servant of all.’ And ‘Aiel’, ‘Dedicated,’ in the Old Tongue. Stronger than that; it implies an oath written into your bones. I have often wondered what the Aiel are dedicated to.” The Wise Ones’ faces had gone to iron, but Moiraine continued.
“And Jenn Aiel.’ ‘The true dedicated,’ but again stronger. Perhaps ‘the only true dedicated.’ The only true Aiel?” She looked at them questioningly, just as if they did not suddenly have eyes of stone. None of them spoke.

If one word like Aan'allein can mean one man as well as The Man Who Is An Entire People, then I see no reason why Sedai cannot mean two things.
Look at the word Aiel. It means dedicated, but implies a lot more. Sedai may mean servant, but may imply service to the will of the Pattern/Creator, etc.


That shift in meaning comes from the fact that it becomes a title. The literal meaning does not change. Mierin Sedai means Servant Mierin, but we all know that Mierin is a Servant of All, a person who has dedicated her life to serving the higher good of all. That subtext and meaning comes from the appropriation of the word by the Aes Sedai.

Your original reply suggested that "sedai" meant a person who served the Creator, the Light, or the will of the pattern. There simply is no reason to believe that the word holds that meaning. Sure, there is a subtext that implies status, but that's it.

No. As I've shown, the very same word can mean something different in a different context. I see no reason to exclude Sedai from this rule.
Reply to message
It just occured to me - 31/12/2009 10:12:12 AM 1369 Views
I tink they did - 31/12/2009 10:52:32 AM 657 Views
Re: It just occured to me - 31/12/2009 11:07:29 AM 658 Views
Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 11:34:49 AM 636 Views
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 02:20:32 PM 561 Views
In a democracy though... - 31/12/2009 02:38:21 PM 507 Views
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 04:30:58 PM 561 Views
Depends on what the actual translation is... - 31/12/2009 04:49:54 PM 546 Views
The translation... - 31/12/2009 06:17:07 PM 522 Views
Look at M'Hael - 31/12/2009 08:12:35 PM 550 Views
No... - 31/12/2009 08:19:18 PM 499 Views
And Sedai is not a title? - 31/12/2009 08:47:03 PM 582 Views
Nope, it is an honorific. - 31/12/2009 09:31:37 PM 649 Views
You're really splitting hairs... - 01/01/2010 04:06:02 PM 739 Views
That's why I said I was. - 01/01/2010 06:19:22 PM 648 Views
My 2 cents... which may only be worth 1 - 01/01/2010 06:39:52 PM 625 Views
I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 06:49:25 PM 623 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 07:27:57 PM 638 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 07:37:17 PM 605 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 08:08:58 PM 641 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 09:05:45 PM 607 Views
I think we're pretty much in agreement - 01/01/2010 09:26:26 PM 626 Views
I'd agree with that. - 01/01/2010 10:20:52 PM 571 Views
I think it's a pride of humility thing.... - 31/12/2009 06:24:17 PM 579 Views
They don't care. The meaning of the honorific is irrelevant - all significance comes from context - 01/01/2010 06:08:40 AM 544 Views
I Agree - 01/01/2010 08:36:40 AM 497 Views
Re: I Agree - 01/01/2010 03:04:18 PM 489 Views

Reply to Message