Active Users:1211 Time:23/11/2024 07:13:31 AM
Re: It just occured to me Mysteria Indictus Send a noteboard - 31/12/2009 11:07:29 AM
Isn't it a bit curious that many Aes Sedai demand of lesser people that they are called by their name and the "honorific Sedai". After all, many or most Aes Sedai and other educated people should know that "sedai" just means "servant" in the Old Tongue. That basically means an Aes Sedai e.g. wants to be properly adressed by a servant/novice as "Servant Lelaine", "Servant Elaida" or "Servant Cadsuane", for example. On the other hand, it's said that a character like Nynaeve often tries to make a point by never adding the honorific Sedai to the name, though that only means that she doesn't call the Aes Sedai servant.


Heh, very true.

But of course, the Aes Sedai of the AoL were proud to serve, so they probably found the title honorific. And the Third Age people probably just carried on the tradition, thinking the OT sounds fancy. A bit as if we internet people would demand to be called by our names and the latin word for "geek". By the way, if someone could enlighten me to what that word might be, I'd be grateful.
//Mysteria Indictus
Previously known as NightShade
Gleeman of the Page of Legends
Reply to message
It just occured to me - 31/12/2009 10:12:12 AM 1369 Views
I tink they did - 31/12/2009 10:52:32 AM 657 Views
Re: It just occured to me - 31/12/2009 11:07:29 AM 659 Views
Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 11:34:49 AM 636 Views
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 02:20:32 PM 561 Views
In a democracy though... - 31/12/2009 02:38:21 PM 507 Views
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 04:30:58 PM 561 Views
Depends on what the actual translation is... - 31/12/2009 04:49:54 PM 546 Views
The translation... - 31/12/2009 06:17:07 PM 523 Views
Look at M'Hael - 31/12/2009 08:12:35 PM 550 Views
No... - 31/12/2009 08:19:18 PM 499 Views
And Sedai is not a title? - 31/12/2009 08:47:03 PM 582 Views
Nope, it is an honorific. - 31/12/2009 09:31:37 PM 649 Views
You're really splitting hairs... - 01/01/2010 04:06:02 PM 739 Views
That's why I said I was. - 01/01/2010 06:19:22 PM 648 Views
My 2 cents... which may only be worth 1 - 01/01/2010 06:39:52 PM 625 Views
I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 06:49:25 PM 623 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 07:27:57 PM 638 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 07:37:17 PM 605 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 08:08:58 PM 641 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 09:05:45 PM 608 Views
I think we're pretty much in agreement - 01/01/2010 09:26:26 PM 626 Views
I'd agree with that. - 01/01/2010 10:20:52 PM 571 Views
I think it's a pride of humility thing.... - 31/12/2009 06:24:17 PM 579 Views
They don't care. The meaning of the honorific is irrelevant - all significance comes from context - 01/01/2010 06:08:40 AM 544 Views
I Agree - 01/01/2010 08:36:40 AM 497 Views
Re: I Agree - 01/01/2010 03:04:18 PM 489 Views

Reply to Message