Active Users:290 Time:19/04/2025 04:06:38 PM
I don't say... Etzel Send a noteboard - 30/12/2009 12:08:27 PM
That Slayer is the only one able to kill Asmo, but considering the clues he simply makes the most sense. Even Sammael made more sense than Graendal before LoC, because he actually threatens to kill Asmo.

Actually Slayer already appears in Egwene's/Nynaeve's plotline in TDR, when he kills the Gray Man. In the beginning of TSR Slayer is basically in Rand's plotline, when he kills the two BA. Then he hops to Perrin's plotline, when he is hunting Fain, but also appears in Nynaeve's plotline again, when he almost kills her in TSR. In LoC Egwene sees Slayer stalking in TAR. Similarly Slayer is seen spying on the Wondergirls in WH, but also appears in Rand's plotline in Far Madding. Besides that, Slayer (or Luc & Isam) are of course often mentioned by various characters throughout the series.

That shows that Slayer basically jumps between the plotlines, so to speak. And this makes sense, because he is an assassin, who follows the various tasks different patrons give him. Therefore it also makes sense that he killed Asmo, especially if he was sent by a Forsaken linked to Rand's plotline at this time (most likely Graendal or Lanfear; but one also can't completely rule out Mesaana, Sammael or Moridin).

Your argument that Slayer is only tied to Perrin's plotline and therefore couldn't appear in Rand's plotline in TFoH makes obviously no sense and is even refuted in the books. Considering that we had two other mysterious assassinations in the books before Asmo's death - namely the killing of the two BA in the Stone and the killing of the Gray Man in the WT - it makes sense that the same killer stroke again in the Caemlyn Palace to kill Asmo.
Reply to message
Fain's Myrddraal - 28/12/2009 01:45:58 PM 1847 Views
Nope, Myrddraal have been nothing but cannon fodder since book four *NM* - 28/12/2009 03:01:01 PM 440 Views
except, of course, for Shaidar Haran *NM* - 28/12/2009 03:12:17 PM 449 Views
But what was the purpose then? - 28/12/2009 03:43:01 PM 814 Views
To show the relationship between Fain and DO - 28/12/2009 03:52:59 PM 773 Views
Maybe... - 28/12/2009 04:02:42 PM 794 Views
Re: Maybe... - 29/12/2009 03:58:57 AM 1042 Views
Re: Fain's Myrddraal - 28/12/2009 03:19:37 PM 815 Views
Slayer also hunts Rand - 28/12/2009 03:57:11 PM 823 Views
I think it's possible that Slayer could have killed Asmo - 28/12/2009 04:35:57 PM 734 Views
The explanations - 28/12/2009 05:06:02 PM 997 Views
Perhaps, I still don't buy it, but if that's the way it turns out I won't be shocked - 28/12/2009 05:20:06 PM 918 Views
Your reaction would be similar to BS's then - 28/12/2009 05:57:44 PM 1867 Views
I don't really have a strong opinion on which suspect did it - 28/12/2009 06:03:07 PM 739 Views
Well... - 28/12/2009 06:42:16 PM 789 Views
Indeed *NM* - 28/12/2009 06:55:52 PM 395 Views
Re: The explanations - 28/12/2009 08:01:19 PM 674 Views
The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... - 28/12/2009 08:13:07 PM 773 Views
Re: The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... - 28/12/2009 10:19:24 PM 838 Views
The reason is... - 29/12/2009 11:58:24 AM 819 Views
The reasoning is very weak. - 29/12/2009 03:34:19 PM 812 Views
If you mean... - 29/12/2009 04:01:25 PM 889 Views
A few points - 29/12/2009 04:14:12 PM 742 Views
You are wrong... - 29/12/2009 04:25:09 PM 732 Views
Thanks for the quote .. obviously hadn't heard that one before! - 29/12/2009 04:31:37 PM 834 Views
Key word - "possibly" - 29/12/2009 04:38:46 PM 744 Views
As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. - 29/12/2009 05:06:47 PM 710 Views
Re: As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. - 29/12/2009 06:08:09 PM 643 Views
Well, it protects you of Shadowspawn, not that bad. - 29/12/2009 06:12:04 PM 720 Views
I don't think what happened to Fain or Slayer are "gifts" - 29/12/2009 06:26:15 PM 643 Views
Slayer calls it "gifts" in his PoV - 29/12/2009 06:37:49 PM 689 Views
I think you are stretching the reality a bit - 29/12/2009 06:42:10 PM 732 Views
You confuse it a bit... - 29/12/2009 06:57:07 PM 794 Views
I think you've got it backwards - 29/12/2009 07:12:02 PM 687 Views
However... - 29/12/2009 07:16:08 PM 730 Views
I wasn't arguing that point - 29/12/2009 08:13:25 PM 953 Views
Some things don't have to be spelled out, if they are that clear... *NM* - 29/12/2009 08:18:05 PM 684 Views
clearly they do since people are discussing it! - 29/12/2009 09:37:00 PM 667 Views
Yes; it is not readily apparant that the mark was made with the TP. - 29/12/2009 06:12:07 PM 728 Views
Sorry, but that is utter nonsense - 29/12/2009 06:24:54 PM 820 Views
You are incorrect; I'm actually thinking that you only skimmed certain sections! - 29/12/2009 06:38:37 PM 780 Views
Simply read the books and what the authors said... - 29/12/2009 06:55:42 PM 731 Views
Sorry, I think you have an opinion and read everything to support it in this case. - 29/12/2009 07:02:42 PM 702 Views
Ok, then we play dumb, if you like... - 29/12/2009 07:14:58 PM 810 Views
Because the Dark One is not merely a super channeler. - 29/12/2009 07:21:21 PM 829 Views
Well, I disagree of course... - 29/12/2009 07:36:19 PM 947 Views
You are mistaken on quite a few counts. - 29/12/2009 04:37:51 PM 892 Views
Actually... - 29/12/2009 05:04:54 PM 793 Views
BWB says... - 29/12/2009 05:48:40 PM 1027 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 29/12/2009 06:12:30 PM 366 Views
Well... - 29/12/2009 06:18:08 PM 839 Views
Just pointing out that your comment about Lanfear and Moggy not being assassins - 29/12/2009 06:37:21 PM 744 Views
No... - 29/12/2009 06:47:07 PM 934 Views
Re: No... - 29/12/2009 07:00:20 PM 907 Views
Again... - 29/12/2009 07:10:12 PM 667 Views
So you dismiss the actual assassinations the Forsaken have performed on-screen? - 29/12/2009 07:26:55 PM 699 Views
Again... - 29/12/2009 07:47:57 PM 640 Views
I think any Forsaken is capable of doing it. - 29/12/2009 08:05:10 PM 740 Views
Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. - 29/12/2009 08:16:50 PM 613 Views
Re: Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. - 29/12/2009 09:21:23 PM 708 Views
She kidnapped the Sharan's ... who's to say she hasn't killed others? *NM* - 29/12/2009 08:17:28 PM 377 Views
Yeah, after TFoH! We are looking for clues before LoC, guys! *sigh* - 29/12/2009 08:31:13 PM 589 Views
Where did I say this was a clue to her doing it? - 29/12/2009 09:58:29 PM 822 Views
I don't say... - 30/12/2009 12:08:27 PM 892 Views
Most of what you are talking about with Slayer is discoverd after LoC - 30/12/2009 02:36:18 PM 797 Views
Re: Well... - 29/12/2009 06:41:29 PM 712 Views
It becomes clear... - 29/12/2009 06:59:03 PM 645 Views
Basically, you think Slayer killed him. I do not. Nor do I care. - 29/12/2009 07:04:20 PM 626 Views
Fair enough. *NM* - 29/12/2009 07:17:22 PM 429 Views
Re: Slayer also hunts Rand - 28/12/2009 04:39:36 PM 891 Views
As said... - 28/12/2009 04:54:07 PM 719 Views
Re: As said... - 28/12/2009 07:49:22 PM 718 Views
It's rather the TP, which makes Slayer inhuman... - 28/12/2009 08:21:20 PM 689 Views
makes you wonder - 28/12/2009 09:45:08 PM 744 Views
Re: makes you wonder - 28/12/2009 10:16:57 PM 767 Views
I think... - 29/12/2009 12:03:41 PM 683 Views
Fain's Myrddraal killed asmo LOL *NM* - 29/12/2009 05:26:22 AM 433 Views
It is quite obvious that it was Mistress Laras. *NM* - 29/12/2009 03:35:36 PM 396 Views
Intuitively, even. *NM* - 29/12/2009 06:03:13 PM 392 Views

Reply to Message