Active Users:1178 Time:22/11/2024 11:32:24 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books taura-tierno Send a noteboard - 27/12/2009 06:37:47 PM
phrases like "the strongest Aes Sedai wielding the most powerful sa'angreal..."

if the angreal are only reservoirs, then the AS strength wouldn't matter.


If the sa'angreal strength is added to the "normal" strength of an Aes Sedai, it might make a difference. Not much by comparison, true, but "the strongest Aes Sedai wielding the most powerful sa'angreal" also sounds much more dramatic to say than "the weakest novie wielding the most powerful sa'angreal".
Reply to message
Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:10:57 AM 1582 Views
You should include quotes TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 11:42:20 AM 767 Views
The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:57:20 AM 823 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Watcher - 12/11/2009 12:37:46 PM 751 Views
Sure, I agree... Shannow - 12/11/2009 12:45:33 PM 693 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:27:41 PM 731 Views
Please elaborate... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:42:17 PM 736 Views
On the basis that we dont agree on the use of sa'angreals on a group. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 03:02:29 PM 689 Views
OK, I'll humour you. This once. Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:18:57 PM 712 Views
How generous of you. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 07:51:54 PM 791 Views
Scrap that TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:32:36 PM 699 Views
Rand Balefires a whole castle Insomdeon - 12/11/2009 01:10:05 PM 873 Views
There is no basis for that conclusion... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:02:37 PM 743 Views
I could have sprayed TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:28:41 PM 704 Views
Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:09:30 PM 851 Views
It stands for Super Amazing. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 12/11/2009 04:10:02 PM 328 Views
I was under the assumption it was super awesome but oh well. *NM* Blaine - 13/11/2009 06:08:36 AM 363 Views
There's never been any indication that sa'angreal work through a different mechanism to angreal... Shannow - 12/11/2009 04:51:13 PM 767 Views
It has always been a viable theory, and Sanderson seems convincing...EDIT: RJ's take fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 08:21:17 PM 758 Views
Wrong place *ignore* Sidious - 12/11/2009 08:45:32 PM 661 Views
Do you still stick by the exponential theory? TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:52:31 PM 645 Views
I do *NM* Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:56 PM 288 Views
Good, 'cos it's bloody good. *NM* TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 10:56:30 PM 303 Views
Re: Wrong place *ignore* taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:14:51 PM 688 Views
sa'angreal and angreal are only different in terms of the magnitude of their effects *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 06:56:43 PM 325 Views
Re: Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? TheUltimateReality - 12/11/2009 07:48:37 PM 734 Views
You are missing two important points PatAtt - 12/11/2009 05:09:35 PM 853 Views
Response to both points... Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:57:11 PM 750 Views
In fact, I've just read the actual report, and Sanderson didn't say anything near what you quoted. Shannow - 12/11/2009 06:06:39 PM 654 Views
Re: Look at how similar descriptions of angreal and Sa'angreal affects are in the books. Tedtheman - 12/11/2009 07:34:16 PM 702 Views
I completely agree with you Shannow Marshall - 12/11/2009 07:01:29 PM 682 Views
Sidious' "One Power Dynamics" Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:10:41 PM 1143 Views
Oh, also Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:15:56 PM 720 Views
As long as you reference him, I doubt he'd mind. *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 08:36:59 PM 317 Views
there's a slight problem with your theory Jim - 12/11/2009 08:19:25 PM 621 Views
Probably Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:31 PM 1040 Views
Agreed, with one point Marshall - 12/11/2009 09:25:09 PM 651 Views
Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... fionwe1987 - 13/11/2009 12:33:04 AM 659 Views
There is an argument for a minimum strength argument in the Great Hunt Ryan - 13/11/2009 03:26:11 AM 674 Views
Re: Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:00:15 PM 565 Views
Re: Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:11:34 PM 664 Views
Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 12:51:51 AM 605 Views
Re: Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:37:47 PM 629 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes