Active Users:312 Time:11/04/2025 07:33:18 AM
So RJ used two separate scales, one actual one relative, to explain the same thing? fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 18/12/2009 11:33:20 PM
Bell curves are usually not centered on the mean or median. This is a statistical fact.

In order for a distribution to be a bell curve it is, by definition, centered on its mean.

From The Wikipedia article "Normal distribution"
In probability theory and statistics, the normal distribution or Gaussian distribution is a continuous probability distribution that describes data that cluster around the mean. The graph of the associated probability density function is bell-shaped, with a peak at the mean, and is known as the Gaussian function or bell curve.


I propose that the Bell Curve is cut by zero at around 2 standard deviations below the mean. In other words, while it is a perfect Bell Curve, you'd have to draw the bottom portion of it as an imaginary curve below zero strength.

If not that, then it must be a relative scale, where each movement away from the mean is a proportional one, rather than an absolute one.

Remember, RJ's 21 level scale isn't supposed to be superimposed on the Bell Curve. The Bell Curve is merely another, independent tool to represent the channeling population.
Reply to message
The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's strength - 18/12/2009 08:37:55 AM 1421 Views
I always thought the curve was one sided - 18/12/2009 01:17:32 PM 815 Views
I would say that your sample is flawed. - 18/12/2009 05:02:02 PM 887 Views
well said *NM* - 18/12/2009 05:12:40 PM 416 Views
It doesn't matter... - 18/12/2009 10:02:38 PM 750 Views
But, it sort of does. - 18/12/2009 10:43:08 PM 808 Views
So you're saying that no modern Aes Sedai are even of average strength? - 18/12/2009 10:51:01 PM 896 Views
Are you sure it's the same bell curve from the AoL? - 18/12/2009 11:11:19 PM 845 Views
The Tower is restricted to the middle... - 18/12/2009 05:35:03 PM 971 Views
Two things... - 18/12/2009 09:28:25 PM 806 Views
The culling theory... - 18/12/2009 09:36:34 PM 752 Views
The culling theory applies to the ENTIRE population, not just Aes Sedai... - 18/12/2009 09:42:31 PM 875 Views
Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 09:48:59 PM 940 Views
Re: Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 10:06:15 PM 735 Views
Several more things... - 18/12/2009 11:26:19 PM 901 Views
You don't understand your own model... - 18/12/2009 11:38:05 PM 921 Views
So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:03:24 PM 814 Views
Re: So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:10:52 PM 779 Views
Its simple really... - 19/12/2009 06:15:23 PM 798 Views
Age-Related Sample Bias - 18/12/2009 06:41:03 PM 765 Views
A thought that occured to me, and I'd like your opinion... - 18/12/2009 07:38:29 PM 766 Views
Well Sharina isn't a sparker and she's the strongest AS - 18/12/2009 07:57:17 PM 773 Views
Yes... - 18/12/2009 08:01:57 PM 869 Views
Is it just my bad memory or is one of the wondergirls not a sparker? - 18/12/2009 10:12:59 PM 756 Views
I think it's just a bad memory... - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 759 Views
Easier sulution, and real example. - 18/12/2009 10:03:20 PM 821 Views
And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 18/12/2009 10:08:40 PM 777 Views
Re: And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 19/12/2009 11:39:31 AM 1013 Views
Agree, but a little more curvy is better - 19/12/2009 11:17:16 PM 717 Views
*facepalm* - 18/12/2009 10:13:16 PM 797 Views
That's just the normalized value graphed on a log scale. - 19/12/2009 11:20:41 PM 773 Views
Dude, Seriously? - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 790 Views
Indeed, and that's why I propose that... - 18/12/2009 10:31:23 PM 786 Views
So RJ used two separate scales, one actual one relative, to explain the same thing? - 18/12/2009 11:33:20 PM 748 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:10 PM 767 Views
It does to RJ - 20/12/2009 03:12:30 PM 846 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:11 PM 741 Views
That's because outliers in IQ tests are excluded form the curve. *NM* - 18/12/2009 11:31:23 PM 443 Views
Really?!?! then what is the definition of a IQ of 200? - 19/12/2009 11:28:18 PM 1077 Views
You can have IQ's above that... - 20/12/2009 05:09:44 AM 787 Views
I said that in the other post and was half torn to pieces *NM* - 19/12/2009 11:38:25 AM 387 Views
Eh. Ignore the IQ value and draw it on a linear weight scale - 19/12/2009 11:26:23 PM 750 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's stre - 19/12/2009 06:02:34 PM 717 Views
I like this idea - 20/12/2009 04:01:28 PM 926 Views
Accidental Post *NM* - 20/12/2009 07:11:09 PM 434 Views
Mathmatically this is very close to the system I proposed in another thread - 27/12/2009 01:23:51 AM 727 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: - 27/12/2009 10:05:33 PM 885 Views
What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 27/12/2009 10:28:13 PM 1084 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:19:14 PM 764 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:30:44 PM 984 Views

Reply to Message