I'd rather see them keep the a'dam, and just leash all the current sul'dam
imlad Send a noteboard - 18/12/2009 03:04:22 AM
Including that most snooty of bitches. Yeah, I'm talking about Tuon. Grr... She's worse to read then Aviendha or the Wonder Girls. And, Tuon should be tattooed with the ravens. Cause a nasty little ownership problem for herself, eh?
Just put leashes on all the damane and sul'dam, and put the bracelets on a peg. That will keep them all out of Rand's hair.
And while we are at it, lets leash Cadsuane and her cohort. The channeling Wise Ones need to be leashed too.
I can only think of a couple of female channelers that DON'T need to be leashed. They are: ... ... um, I can't think of any. If they were really nice to me, I might let Egwene and Moiraine stay unleashed, but not likely.
I just wish there were a'dam that were designed for MEN to wear the bracelet. I have yet to see a single channeling female (outside MAYBE Moiraine) that does not need to be taught humility, and to be reminding that Aes Sedai means "servants of all"
After all of these marath'damane are leashed, then make all the non-channeling Wise Ones da'covale, since those women are just as bad as the channelers.
A resounding "NO WAY". Egwene was against a fourth oath demanding obedience or fealty to the Amyrlin. How can you possibly think she would consider letting AS take an oath of fealty to the Empress? How could they do that and still maintain allegiance to the WT when their loyalties would be compromised?
I feel fairly confident that the Empire will see the Light and unleash female channelers before the series is over. Satelle Anan already started working on Tuon to this end, and I'm pretty sure this is why RJ sent her with Mat in the first place, otherwise, it was pointless for her to be there.
Just put leashes on all the damane and sul'dam, and put the bracelets on a peg. That will keep them all out of Rand's hair.
And while we are at it, lets leash Cadsuane and her cohort. The channeling Wise Ones need to be leashed too.
I can only think of a couple of female channelers that DON'T need to be leashed. They are: ... ... um, I can't think of any. If they were really nice to me, I might let Egwene and Moiraine stay unleashed, but not likely.
I just wish there were a'dam that were designed for MEN to wear the bracelet. I have yet to see a single channeling female (outside MAYBE Moiraine) that does not need to be taught humility, and to be reminding that Aes Sedai means "servants of all"
After all of these marath'damane are leashed, then make all the non-channeling Wise Ones da'covale, since those women are just as bad as the channelers.
Does anyone think that Fortuona and Egwene could reach a compromise where the Seanchan release the damane to the Aes Sedai for training provided that the ex-damane take a fourth oath of fealty to the Empress? It seems unlikely now, but if Fortuona saves Egwene (again), might Egwene and her experience changes of heart? Fortuona will soon realize that circles are too powerful for individual damane to match, and it might occur to her that the oath rod is as good a leash as a leash. Better, she will not have to worry about renegade suldam.
A resounding "NO WAY". Egwene was against a fourth oath demanding obedience or fealty to the Amyrlin. How can you possibly think she would consider letting AS take an oath of fealty to the Empress? How could they do that and still maintain allegiance to the WT when their loyalties would be compromised?
I feel fairly confident that the Empire will see the Light and unleash female channelers before the series is over. Satelle Anan already started working on Tuon to this end, and I'm pretty sure this is why RJ sent her with Mat in the first place, otherwise, it was pointless for her to be there.
Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
The Empress and the oath rod
- 09/12/2009 07:25:36 PM
1170 Views
wishful thinking if you ask me. The point is "freedom" from leashes. Having the take oaths is worse. *NM*
- 09/12/2009 07:46:35 PM
306 Views
I think we already know Egwene's position on a "Fourth Oath"
- 09/12/2009 08:17:11 PM
940 Views
I'd rather see them keep the a'dam, and just leash all the current sul'dam
- 18/12/2009 03:04:22 AM
840 Views
Fortuona didn't save Egwene and a Fourth Oath to an Empress is worse than what Elaida wanted.
- 09/12/2009 08:18:17 PM
713 Views
True, but...
- 09/12/2009 10:02:13 PM
654 Views
So you advocate slavery?
- 09/12/2009 11:12:29 PM
656 Views
C'mon!
- 09/12/2009 11:43:44 PM
674 Views
The "Binder" is another form of Slavery.
- 09/12/2009 11:54:51 PM
657 Views
Re: The "Binder" is another form of Slavery.
- 10/12/2009 12:09:31 AM
734 Views
We have 2 major WoT societies where the channelers
- 10/12/2009 12:15:58 AM
639 Views
Don't be so quick to judge these two societies yet.
- 10/12/2009 05:06:33 AM
723 Views
*NM*
yet both groups hold highly influential positions within their societies without being shunned *NM*
- 10/12/2009 06:31:15 AM
289 Views
I don't know about being 'quick' - we've had at least 8 books to become familiar with the cultures
- 11/12/2009 03:18:32 PM
763 Views
I am thinking about straight oath without WT training.
- 09/12/2009 09:04:15 PM
769 Views
Or you could look to the organizations which have no "Binding" and no DFs
- 09/12/2009 11:17:18 PM
613 Views
Re: Or you could look to the organizations which have no "Binding" and no DFs
- 10/12/2009 12:00:03 AM
656 Views
I agree that there is no way the Seanchan are going to be able to change overnight
- 10/12/2009 12:12:00 AM
607 Views
I am sure that there are Blue Blood damane
- 10/12/2009 12:24:41 AM
612 Views
*NM*
I agree.
- 10/12/2009 12:48:23 AM
621 Views
Of course not!
- 10/12/2009 01:13:10 AM
631 Views
When did Tuon save Egwene ? *NM*
- 10/12/2009 11:49:29 AM
285 Views
It refers to part of Egwene's dream that is yet unfulfilled. It COULD mean Tuon save her. *NM*
- 10/12/2009 03:46:15 PM
279 Views