Active Users:877 Time:15/11/2024 08:59:23 AM
Oh, yes. Because damane NEVER fight soldiers, and would thus ignore them. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 17/12/2009 09:00:41 PM
The damane and sul'dam cannot see the weaves from men. I'd dress up the bonded Asha'man to make them look like tower guards. Then I'd have the Asha'man simply club every sul'dam and damane they see with a mace of air. The Seanchan would have no idea what was hitting them. They'd be focusing all their attention on the circles of women. After all, who could ignore the enormous volumes of power being wielded right in front of your face by the circles of women. That's the secret power of the ASha'man disguised as tower guards. While the seanchan focus on the AS circles, the Asha'man would be extremely deadly.


You think the damane would really overlook soldiers? By your argument, they didn't do any fighting since they came to the wetlands, since you seem to think they only fight channelers. Why do you think that dealing with flows they can't see would freak them out? They have already faced the Asha'man in combat, and done a credible job. It was Rand's superior mobility that was driving the Seanchan back, not any great advantage of channeling. The Seanchan were spread out through the mountains, and he was defeating their forces in detail. Once they realized he did not have a massive force and was using Travelling, the Seanchan adapted and came up with a plan that started costing Rand, and made Bashere want to call it quits. The Seanchan WILL adapt, react & overcome the novelty of such a tactic as they have before, and there is nothing to suggest that Travelling, saidin or linking will present any insurrmountable obstacles to them.

That is not to say these things cannot be useful. When the Seanchan adapted to Rand's mobility by concentrating their forces so Rand would have to attack their superior numbers, they became vulnerable to a single, phenomenally powerful attacker, such as when Rand whipped out Callandor and inflicted on them their greatest defeat not involving undead superheroes. Gareth Bryne could no doubt take advantage of these two weapons. He can concentrate them by using gateways to defeat their dispersed forces in detail, and he can blast their large concentrations with blasts from linked circles that individual damane cannot overcome. The biggest question is whether Egwene will give him his head in such matters.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Learning traveling will help the Seanchan, but the AS still have the advantage. - 17/12/2009 01:13:32 AM 1294 Views
Bryne will without a doubt be in charge - 17/12/2009 01:28:02 AM 651 Views
Re: Learning traveling will help the Seanchan, but the AS still have the advantage. - 17/12/2009 01:39:32 AM 789 Views
Linking provides another benefit. - 17/12/2009 02:02:05 AM 719 Views
Wow, if that happens, I will be her biggest fan *NM* - 17/12/2009 02:10:01 AM 412 Views
What an utterly stupid idea. - 17/12/2009 11:35:24 AM 679 Views
Your facts are incorrect. - 17/12/2009 02:41:42 PM 697 Views
There is a way to get around the "first strike" limitation. - 17/12/2009 05:25:05 PM 615 Views
another linking advantage - 17/12/2009 02:10:56 AM 598 Views
All that will do is take the best fighters out of action. - 17/12/2009 11:55:55 AM 643 Views
I have to agree with Cannoli on this, but with a twist. - 17/12/2009 02:46:03 PM 704 Views
Why mace of air? - 17/12/2009 05:58:32 PM 619 Views
Oh, yes. Because damane NEVER fight soldiers, and would thus ignore them. - 17/12/2009 09:00:41 PM 579 Views
Re: All that will do is take the best fighters out of action. - 17/12/2009 07:38:55 PM 553 Views
Re: All that will do is take the best fighters out of action. - 17/12/2009 08:49:28 PM 522 Views
Why did you post this? - 17/12/2009 09:35:09 AM 697 Views
I have not read Darius Sedai's post. Sorry. *NM* - 17/12/2009 02:49:20 PM 323 Views
What post are you talking about? - 17/12/2009 04:57:14 PM 506 Views
Re: What post are you talking about? - 17/12/2009 11:31:06 PM 625 Views
Here it is - 18/12/2009 12:42:45 AM 577 Views
I actually brought it up in an earlier thread too *NM* - 18/12/2009 12:46:56 AM 314 Views
thanks for the credit... PS I'm a guy *NM* - 18/12/2009 12:10:56 AM 344 Views
Ooops - 18/12/2009 12:48:22 AM 598 Views
I'm totally teasing you ... I added the "sedai" to be snarky - 18/12/2009 12:55:51 AM 986 Views
Yeah, I don't get that: Fantasy gender-nuetral honorific, plus Real World male name = female? - 18/12/2009 05:35:17 AM 652 Views
Cannoli sedai? *NM* - 18/12/2009 02:15:18 PM 598 Views
what about the oaths - 17/12/2009 01:24:57 PM 642 Views
The oaths stand as no bar. - 17/12/2009 02:48:32 PM 619 Views

Reply to Message