That didn't matter to the binder.
She didn't state that Gitara died without saying anything, she told two people who were there to lie, and which lie to tell.
She could not say that as a statement, but as instructions she could.
Intent and result.
She didn't state that Gitara died without saying anything, she told two people who were there to lie, and which lie to tell.
She could not say that as a statement, but as instructions she could.
Intent and result.
That's the point, that she did state it. Aes Sedai can state things as long as you're not trying to trick someone, according to RJ.
There was a huge argument about this when NS was released
"You will tell no one about this, not for any reason. If necessary, lie. Even to a sister. Gitara died without speaking. Do you understand me?"
Cadsuane lies!
06/12/2009 06:10:41 PM
- 2021 Views
Re: Cadsuane lies!
06/12/2009 06:18:39 PM
- 1226 Views
Sarcasm is one thing
06/12/2009 06:43:12 PM
- 947 Views
I disagree
06/12/2009 06:51:27 PM
- 903 Views
RJ has said they're allowed to be sarcastic
06/12/2009 07:07:32 PM
- 864 Views
How does that jive with the Oaths?
06/12/2009 07:13:21 PM
- 903 Views
Good point, but in that same book Tamra said that Gitara didn't say anything before dying *NM*
06/12/2009 07:53:31 PM
- 415 Views
Re: Good point, but in that same book Tamra said that Gitara didn't say anything before dying
06/12/2009 08:03:36 PM
- 958 Views
Yes, she did state it.
06/12/2009 08:57:47 PM
- 882 Views
The Oaths focus on INTENT
06/12/2009 10:01:27 PM
- 859 Views
Because it isn't a lie
06/12/2009 07:44:29 PM
- 869 Views
I understand this, I'm not arguing that an AS should not be able to be sarcastic
06/12/2009 08:08:15 PM
- 860 Views
Re: I understand this, I'm not arguing that an AS should not be able to be sarcastic
06/12/2009 08:35:23 PM
- 887 Views
Quote for you
06/12/2009 08:42:52 PM
- 824 Views
The sarcasm was for him repeating himself to her. The "remember" is the part she's refering to.
07/12/2009 10:15:06 AM
- 665 Views
That's why I think this example of sarcasm works as opposed to Cadsuane who makes a false statement
07/12/2009 03:17:52 PM
- 723 Views
sarcasm is sarcasm. In both instances their is technically a lie.
07/12/2009 11:28:02 PM
- 683 Views
Not at all the case
07/12/2009 11:58:42 PM
- 771 Views
Do you really believe he waited till the last minute to tell Seonid?
14/12/2009 01:32:37 PM
- 831 Views
What about the Sheriam thing?
07/12/2009 01:49:32 PM
- 705 Views
Re: What about the Sheriam thing?
07/12/2009 02:15:25 PM
- 670 Views
But surely an Aes Sedai can answer a question she hasn't fully heard yet.
07/12/2009 03:06:34 PM
- 807 Views
Sarcasm
06/12/2009 07:14:47 PM
- 901 Views
It's obviously meant to be sarcasm, I just don't like
06/12/2009 07:18:40 PM
- 696 Views
Here is what RJ said about it
06/12/2009 07:41:18 PM
- 846 Views
Well I have to say I think RJ made the wrong call with this one *NM*
06/12/2009 07:43:47 PM
- 370 Views
Agreed.
07/12/2009 01:45:39 AM
- 650 Views
You can already drive a truck through the oaths. Does this one additional tiny gap really matter?
07/12/2009 04:07:16 AM
- 679 Views
what do you think a RL lie detector would tell in this case?
07/12/2009 12:27:07 PM
- 648 Views
in RL you would get warned by the investigator to cooperate
07/12/2009 01:04:33 PM
- 694 Views
But how would the machine reading indicate?
07/12/2009 07:04:22 PM
- 678 Views
Usually you're s'possed to answer with a yes or no. It's easy to tell when you're evasive
09/12/2009 10:46:58 PM
- 704 Views
Where's the problem?
09/12/2009 04:18:40 PM
- 610 Views
It's in the way the Oath is worded
09/12/2009 05:14:39 PM
- 664 Views
PS You misread my original quote
09/12/2009 11:00:56 PM
- 614 Views
Lies, untruths, sarcasm, and meaning
09/12/2009 07:46:25 PM
- 741 Views
We are starting understand each other
09/12/2009 10:09:41 PM
- 703 Views