Active Users:804 Time:24/11/2024 11:21:15 AM
Re: But she had to suspect that she may not have been able to secure it and she seemed johnnymack Send a noteboard - 04/12/2009 11:34:58 PM


uncertain on if she could even remove the Oaths. I believe the oath against betrayal kept her from giving Mat that letter until she was convinced that she would not be betraying the DO until "the hour of her death", or post-death in this case.


This seems the most logical and likely. The letter betrays her oath and thus can't be opened until her death..simple and easy.
Johnnymack.
Reply to message
Verin and Mat - 04/12/2009 07:43:25 PM 988 Views
I doubt that if mat had opened early - 04/12/2009 07:46:49 PM 685 Views
I'm not so sure... - 04/12/2009 07:53:05 PM 703 Views
I disagree completely. - 04/12/2009 08:55:51 PM 810 Views
But she had to suspect that she may not have been able to secure it and she seemed - 04/12/2009 09:22:08 PM 566 Views
Re: But she had to suspect that she may not have been able to secure it and she seemed - 04/12/2009 11:34:58 PM 563 Views
That's what I think - 04/12/2009 11:58:03 PM 531 Views
The real question, of course, is "what's in the letter"? *NM* - 05/12/2009 11:41:01 AM 220 Views

Reply to Message