Active Users:1115 Time:22/11/2024 01:59:02 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I'm not convinced. I don't believe she'd want to subject herself to being sworn. lord-of-shadow Send a noteboard - 01/12/2009 09:54:40 PM
First, actually being BOUND by the oaths would be absolutely unacceptable to her.

Second, they half a person's lifetime. Which might not matter to her if she's truly been granted immortality, but we don't actually know the nature of the promised immortality, so it might still be a factor.

True, there is a reasonably good chance that she could get her hands on the oaths and unswear them - but it's far from certain. I don't think she'd risk it.
Reply to message
Mesaana was easily able to get past the Oath Rod. Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 09:35:07 PM 1210 Views
Obviously artois - 01/12/2009 09:45:32 PM 755 Views
I'm not convinced. I don't believe she'd want to subject herself to being sworn. lord-of-shadow - 01/12/2009 09:54:40 PM 736 Views
Not just that, but in the AoL, the Oath Rod was used to "bind criminals". *NM* Lord Haart - 02/12/2009 05:41:35 AM 271 Views
It might even kill her Sidious - 04/12/2009 11:59:37 AM 480 Views
Didn't Sanderson say as much? *NM* Tom - 01/12/2009 10:06:56 PM 259 Views
I don't know what Sanderson may have said. *NM* Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 10:13:58 PM 240 Views
I thought... artois - 01/12/2009 10:11:45 PM 574 Views
To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 01/12/2009 10:37:29 PM 586 Views
Re: To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 10:42:51 PM 571 Views
shaido still have it moondog - 02/12/2009 02:32:25 AM 624 Views
Well, that's just one oath. The other two are not as easy to circumvent. BlackAdder - 02/12/2009 01:19:53 AM 671 Views
But given free will, they can interpret "danger" to mean "clear and present" or "potential danger" RugbyPlayingAshaman - 02/12/2009 04:54:26 PM 497 Views
Last defense of life cannot mean potential danger. *NM* fionwe1987 - 02/12/2009 05:51:27 PM 212 Views
Yes it can. It all depends on interpretation. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 03/12/2009 12:22:47 AM 496 Views
Ummm, what? fionwe1987 - 03/12/2009 02:23:08 AM 436 Views
Re: Ummm, what? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 03/12/2009 11:15:20 PM 455 Views
None of this is a twisting of the Oaths. Her actions stick to the letter of the Oaths. fionwe1987 - 04/12/2009 04:29:44 AM 570 Views
Moiraine wasn't worried about getting around the Oaths Sidious - 04/12/2009 04:41:04 AM 482 Views
Here's a couple quotes from BS Light in the Night - 01/12/2009 11:57:16 PM 603 Views
Trouble is that would put a person into stasis Ryan - 02/12/2009 04:14:31 AM 480 Views
It only has to be maintained long enough to take the Oaths. *NM* Light in the Night - 02/12/2009 04:51:34 AM 223 Views
Eh, from what we've seen, Keepings don't really work like that beetnemesis - 02/12/2009 06:42:19 AM 624 Views
Probably just needs to be modified a bit Light in the Night - 02/12/2009 07:36:41 AM 599 Views
Keepers are for channellers, and are see through. Great Lord of Chaos - 02/12/2009 09:59:17 AM 478 Views
Turn off the Rod balefried - 02/12/2009 09:52:39 PM 592 Views
Does the bonded person do the channeling? Onarishma - 03/12/2009 05:52:09 AM 483 Views
....it is a physical requirement so "gloves" it is Onarishma - 03/12/2009 06:58:55 AM 1068 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes