Active Users:400 Time:27/11/2024 12:39:24 AM
More "REAL" because characterization is off artois Send a noteboard - 01/12/2009 07:48:57 PM
I agree with you that some of his word choices were a bit off (though part of me thinks that BS was test writing Mat in this book LOOKING for just this sort of fan feedback-he IS hard to write... I imagine), but that some other inconsistencies can be explaned situationally.

Mat has been under extreme stress for much of the series, and was for part of the latest book, but his situation is also changed somewhat. He is married...and is now a PRINCE! I suspect that denial is creeping in, which would exagerate some of his personality traits, and possibly make him seem slightly less mature than before, a sort of reverting to the personality he displayed at the series outset.

I think his subconcious is sorting out his new role, and that his slightly 'off' characterization is merely his mind trying to protect itself.
Reply to message
Mat Cauthan... lost in translation? - 30/11/2009 11:40:57 PM 987 Views
I liked Mat throughout. - 01/12/2009 12:09:24 AM 630 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 01/12/2009 08:58:46 AM 185 Views
I agree completely. - 01/12/2009 01:20:17 AM 507 Views
Re: I agree completely. - 01/12/2009 01:24:02 AM 460 Views
Re: I agree completely. - 02/12/2009 03:23:59 AM 389 Views
I didn't think that Mat was that "off" really. - 01/12/2009 01:36:17 AM 476 Views
I don't disagree with Sanderson's intention... - 01/12/2009 03:53:43 AM 590 Views
I completely agree - 01/12/2009 05:26:04 AM 438 Views
Disagree... - 01/12/2009 09:39:05 AM 628 Views
Probably - 01/12/2009 02:01:57 PM 420 Views
Cartoony - 01/12/2009 04:41:31 PM 411 Views
I think this is a consequence of him not really doing anything important. - 01/12/2009 07:29:16 PM 395 Views
Mat was enjoyable, but definitely a bit off, I agree *NM* - 01/12/2009 05:23:30 PM 173 Views
More "REAL" because characterization is off - 01/12/2009 07:48:57 PM 409 Views
Yeah, "burn it" is just strange after hearing "burn me" for so long. - 02/12/2009 12:51:44 AM 441 Views

Reply to Message