Active Users:1249 Time:23/11/2024 07:21:29 AM
That's Really the Only Way Balefire Is Plausible. The Name With No Man Send a noteboard - 29/11/2009 11:10:15 AM
... is that removing her from the Pattern would only remove things that Semhirage did directly. It was Rand's physical hands that caused the bruises, not Semhirage's.

The Graendal example illustrates this as well. When Graendal was destroyed by balefire, the thing that she caused directly -- Compulsion on whatshisface -- was undone. But the indirect things were not. If things that Graendal had indirectly caused had been undone as well, then whatshisface would never have come walking back to Rand.

Otherwise you have a ripple effect since very few actions occur in a vacuum. If balefire undoes not only what the target has done, but anything someone else did because of the targets actions, and anything yet more people did because of what those others did... I know it's supposed to have a powerful effect on the Pattern, but that would probably unravel it the first time balefire was used.
Reply to message
A small something - 29/11/2009 05:04:28 AM 968 Views
Re: A small something - 29/11/2009 05:16:28 AM 618 Views
it was implied he used a particularly strong balefire - 29/11/2009 08:06:10 AM 758 Views
Sermihage just got a whipcord of balefire - 29/11/2009 03:53:23 PM 686 Views
Why would he (or 98% of WoT readers) want that? *NM* - 29/11/2009 05:37:34 AM 229 Views
Maybe because it was done with the True Power ? *NM* - 29/11/2009 06:10:26 AM 213 Views
I just thought it was a continuity error *NM* - 29/11/2009 08:14:25 AM 226 Views
The simplest explanation ... - 29/11/2009 09:24:55 AM 652 Views
That's Really the Only Way Balefire Is Plausible. - 29/11/2009 11:10:15 AM 644 Views
Nice catch - 29/11/2009 03:28:56 PM 515 Views
Ramshalan - 29/11/2009 07:24:59 PM 511 Views
BS explained it on his tour... - 29/11/2009 11:23:18 AM 670 Views
Re: BS explained it on his tour... - 29/11/2009 08:39:07 PM 566 Views
Are we sure? - 29/11/2009 09:14:45 PM 629 Views

Reply to Message