Active Users:247 Time:11/04/2025 08:43:46 AM
Fails the Sanderson confusion test Asha'man Warder Send a noteboard - 20/11/2009 01:07:43 PM
I think this "foreshadowing" was misdirection. The biggest argument against Silviana is that Sanderson would not have questioned whether we have seen Mesaana's persona. He could not have forgotten Silviana, so she can't be Mesaana.
Reply to message
Mesaana == Silviana ... - 19/11/2009 10:34:45 PM 1064 Views
No. *NM* - 19/11/2009 10:36:16 PM 255 Views
No. *NM* - 19/11/2009 10:38:19 PM 234 Views
Sure why the hell not... *NM* - 19/11/2009 10:56:12 PM 243 Views
I like the way you think *NM* - 20/11/2009 12:17:01 AM 222 Views
Thank you *NM* - 26/11/2009 08:41:04 PM 234 Views
Meh. Yeah, why not? *NM* - 20/11/2009 04:17:46 PM 257 Views
because it's not true *NM* - 19/11/2009 10:59:38 PM 234 Views
Re: Mesaana == Silviana ... - 19/11/2009 11:07:56 PM 735 Views
That's not how speculation works. - 19/11/2009 11:41:55 PM 687 Views
Well, it's how speculation works. Plus, it has charisma! *NM* - 20/11/2009 01:18:48 AM 244 Views
Yes. It is. - 20/11/2009 03:06:04 AM 513 Views
Because I declared it to be so. That is sufficient reason. - 20/11/2009 03:33:54 AM 469 Views
This severely limits any discussion. - 20/11/2009 09:36:17 PM 500 Views
My point exactly . *NM* - 20/11/2009 10:12:06 PM 210 Views
Let me guess - 20/11/2009 12:07:46 AM 619 Views
Yes, the original post was dumb, but... - 20/11/2009 08:09:27 AM 660 Views
Perhaps - 20/11/2009 11:18:56 AM 514 Views
Fails the Sanderson confusion test - 20/11/2009 01:07:43 PM 495 Views
Oh, I see your reasoning. - 20/11/2009 03:14:11 AM 580 Views

Reply to Message