Active Users:657 Time:15/11/2024 06:20:31 PM
Could be in that moment Ryan Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 09:04:59 PM
When all seems lost, and they are making that sacrifice for the Light, they put themselves outside the Dark One's grip. Just an idea.
The past is just that, the past. You can only truly live by looking to the future!
Reply to message
The BA Hunters and their methodology (tGS spoilers) - 19/11/2009 02:16:20 PM 877 Views
It probably has to be a direct betrayal - 19/11/2009 02:53:19 PM 636 Views
Yup, totally. - 19/11/2009 05:45:45 PM 535 Views
Possible reason for the loophole - 19/11/2009 06:04:12 PM 573 Views
Re: Possible reason for the loophole - 19/11/2009 06:36:21 PM 559 Views
Could be in that moment - 19/11/2009 09:04:59 PM 489 Views
But the DO had Rand's mother - don't think she was a DF *NM* - 21/11/2009 06:43:17 PM 228 Views
-please delete this post- *NM* - 21/11/2009 06:46:04 PM 223 Views
-please delete this post- *NM* - 21/11/2009 06:47:40 PM 237 Views
Re: It probably has to be a direct betrayal - 19/11/2009 06:41:03 PM 575 Views
But wasn't Talene *forced* to do that? - 19/11/2009 08:05:48 PM 599 Views
Yeah - 19/11/2009 08:12:16 PM 544 Views
She's tortured - 19/11/2009 08:29:47 PM 597 Views
We know of Talene's escape earlier - 19/11/2009 09:46:35 PM 489 Views
That and any oath on the Oath Rod relies very heavily on the swearer's interpretation of the oath. - 19/11/2009 07:30:55 PM 496 Views
So George Costanza would make the perfect Aes Sedai? *NM* - 19/11/2009 07:40:06 PM 233 Views
*NM* - 19/11/2009 08:01:12 PM 210 Views
True. There's a scene where Cadsuane is told about Aiel in the city and she says "I hadn't noticed." - 19/11/2009 08:21:52 PM 606 Views
Unless she's Black Ajah Just kidding. - 19/11/2009 08:59:49 PM 497 Views
Yep. - 19/11/2009 10:43:11 PM 475 Views
Off with her head!!! - 19/11/2009 10:44:28 PM 468 Views
I was thinking... - 20/11/2009 03:20:32 AM 575 Views
Yes, but they probably asked "Have you ever been Black Ajah?" - 20/11/2009 03:24:48 AM 466 Views
Bigger loophole - 21/11/2009 06:46:42 PM 515 Views

Reply to Message