The Oaths are pretty literal-minded. As long as your current action doesn't directly betray them, you're probably pretty fine.
The wording of the Black Ajah oath though... it's ridiculous. Why, why, why would an organization that is steeped in twisting words and finding loopholes leave something like that open!?
The wording of the Black Ajah oath though... it's ridiculous. Why, why, why would an organization that is steeped in twisting words and finding loopholes leave something like that open!?
I amuse myself.
The BA Hunters and their methodology (tGS spoilers)
19/11/2009 02:16:20 PM
- 877 Views
It probably has to be a direct betrayal
19/11/2009 02:53:19 PM
- 636 Views
Yup, totally.
19/11/2009 05:45:45 PM
- 536 Views
Possible reason for the loophole
19/11/2009 06:04:12 PM
- 574 Views
Re: Possible reason for the loophole
19/11/2009 06:36:21 PM
- 559 Views
Could be in that moment
19/11/2009 09:04:59 PM
- 489 Views
But the DO had Rand's mother - don't think she was a DF *NM*
21/11/2009 06:43:17 PM
- 228 Views
Could have been an illusion. We really know nothing of what happens to souls
24/12/2009 08:14:05 PM
- 451 Views
Re: It probably has to be a direct betrayal
19/11/2009 06:41:03 PM
- 576 Views
But wasn't Talene *forced* to do that?
19/11/2009 08:05:48 PM
- 599 Views
That and any oath on the Oath Rod relies very heavily on the swearer's interpretation of the oath.
19/11/2009 07:30:55 PM
- 497 Views
True. There's a scene where Cadsuane is told about Aiel in the city and she says "I hadn't noticed."
19/11/2009 08:21:52 PM
- 606 Views
Unless she's Black Ajah Just kidding.
19/11/2009 08:59:49 PM
- 498 Views
Maybe that's the real reason she's now taken to wearing a black hood! *NM*
19/11/2009 09:02:06 PM
- 199 Views
There's reason to believe that if any AS removed the Oaths from themselves, it's Cadsuane. *NM*
01/12/2009 04:44:00 PM
- 209 Views
Bigger loophole
21/11/2009 06:46:42 PM
- 516 Views
True, but again perspective seems to determine what is a lie and what isn't
21/11/2009 10:19:19 PM
- 430 Views