Active Users:1106 Time:22/11/2024 07:15:47 PM
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. BlackAdder Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM
If anything, the lack of shock indicates that Graendal is more likely. Of course, I still think it was Lanfear.



He said he wasn't shocked because he read all the theories, even the crazy ones. I don't think that really means anything (the lack of shock).
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1176 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 622 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 730 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 738 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 575 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 544 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 551 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 465 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 420 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 447 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 594 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 543 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 452 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 521 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 641 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 532 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 513 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 224 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 210 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 608 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 732 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 213 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 197 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 451 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 523 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 208 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 558 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 582 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 571 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 453 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 599 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 513 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 491 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 545 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 471 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 429 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 707 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 208 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 200 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 456 Views

Reply to Message