You said above that Graendal will be in the next book, because the timeline issue allows it and you indicated that she might have a PoV then. If you just meant the word "Graendal" will be in the next book, what you wrote doesn't make any sense, but is just plain silly.
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory
- 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM
1177 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
- 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM
622 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books...
- 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM
730 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal
- 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM
738 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV
- 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM
575 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes.
- 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM
544 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV
- 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM
551 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny.
- 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM
466 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it
- 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM
420 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either.
- 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM
448 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo...
- 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM
595 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much.
- 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM
522 Views
That's wrong
- 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM
641 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong.
- 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM
533 Views
right here
- 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM
513 Views
If Graendal's name is mentioned, then "Graendal" is in the book. *NM*
- 15/11/2009 12:13:57 PM
234 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM*
- 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM
224 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM*
- 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM
210 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM
610 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM
610 Views
BS never would have figured it out himself that Graendal did it? *NM*
- 14/11/2009 05:20:19 PM
225 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
- 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM
732 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws...
- 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM
523 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson.
- 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM
582 Views
No. Try again.
- 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM
599 Views
Ok, I will stay alert for further blows to Graendaldunnit, if this didn't already convince you! 
*NM*
- 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM
217 Views
*NM*
- 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM
217 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory
- 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM
514 Views
Nonsense...
- 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM
491 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. 
- 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM
546 Views
- 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM
546 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions...
- 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM
472 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions...
- 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM
429 Views