You said above that Graendal will be in the next book, because the timeline issue allows it and you indicated that she might have a PoV then. If you just meant the word "Graendal" will be in the next book, what you wrote doesn't make any sense, but is just plain silly.
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory
- 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM
1242 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
- 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM
695 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books...
- 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM
805 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal
- 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM
802 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV
- 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM
647 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes.
- 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM
613 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV
- 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM
623 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny.
- 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM
538 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it
- 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM
491 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either.
- 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM
521 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo...
- 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM
668 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much.
- 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM
599 Views
That's wrong
- 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM
712 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong.
- 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM
619 Views
right here
- 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM
584 Views
If Graendal's name is mentioned, then "Graendal" is in the book. *NM*
- 15/11/2009 12:13:57 PM
262 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM*
- 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM
257 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM*
- 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM
235 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM
672 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM
672 Views
BS never would have figured it out himself that Graendal did it? *NM*
- 14/11/2009 05:20:19 PM
250 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
- 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM
802 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws...
- 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM
598 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson.
- 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM
658 Views
No. Try again.
- 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM
669 Views
Ok, I will stay alert for further blows to Graendaldunnit, if this didn't already convince you! 
*NM*
- 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM
232 Views
*NM*
- 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM
232 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory
- 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM
587 Views
Nonsense...
- 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM
559 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. 
- 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM
616 Views
- 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM
616 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions...
- 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM
547 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions...
- 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM
489 Views