Active Users:1112 Time:22/11/2024 02:04:58 PM
The Trollocs need to get Dreadlords from somewhere. lord-of-shadow Send a noteboard - 15/11/2009 08:24:49 AM
After all, Rand will have the Asha'man (whatever's left of them), the Aes Sedai (ditto), likely the Seanchan Damane, the Wise Ones, and maybe even some Windfinders to support his troops in any battles that take place. Oh, and Matt's canons. Hundreds and hundreds of channelers? Good lord, that is an ENORMOUS advantage against any traditional army. Even 60 Black Ajah will do very little to turn the tide, but they're a start.

So yeah, there's a good reason to think you might be right. And that a similar contingent of Asha'man will join them.
This message last edited by lord-of-shadow on 15/11/2009 at 08:25:09 AM
Reply to message
The escaped Black Ajah - 15/11/2009 07:14:13 AM 906 Views
The Trollocs need to get Dreadlords from somewhere. - 15/11/2009 08:24:49 AM 597 Views
Re: The Trollocs need to get Dreadlords from somewhere. - 15/11/2009 09:12:57 AM 520 Views
Yeah, I generally agree.... - 15/11/2009 10:20:20 AM 579 Views
How do you know it was Mesaana? - 15/11/2009 12:53:22 PM 530 Views
Yeah, you are right... - 15/11/2009 01:55:47 PM 538 Views
Did any of the Rebel BA escape? - 16/11/2009 09:57:18 PM 369 Views
About twenty, Egwene mentioned it when she waited with Siuan and Gareth *NM* - 17/11/2009 10:02:38 AM 190 Views
Agreed, but even then... - 15/11/2009 10:22:17 AM 549 Views
The DO might lend a hand to his channel-less armies - 15/11/2009 10:30:41 AM 697 Views
They only need a small number of channelers. - 15/11/2009 11:01:18 AM 497 Views
Rand and a few Asha'man destroyed - 15/11/2009 06:37:54 PM 438 Views
Re: Rand and a few Asha'man destroyed - 16/11/2009 01:25:12 PM 417 Views
I doubt the DO will pull out a longsword - 16/11/2009 08:27:59 PM 394 Views
Along with Taim's dark Asha'man. *NM* - 15/11/2009 03:06:46 PM 206 Views
How about sisters not with the Tower/Rebels? - 15/11/2009 06:48:58 PM 457 Views
Re: How about sisters not with the Tower/Rebels? - 16/11/2009 12:14:48 PM 431 Views

Reply to Message