Active Users:1199 Time:22/11/2024 01:42:05 PM
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. lord-of-shadow Send a noteboard - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM
Speaking as someone who has been reading the books for years, Graendal never even crossed my mind as a possibility except when people at Wotmania suggested it.

It just doesn't make much sense to me. Sure, she had the means, and there aren't any facts contradicting it. But that would be such a low-impact revelation, especially when there are choices like Slayer, Lanfear, Moridin, Demandred, Padan Fain, and Shaidar Haran. Every single one of which has more opportunity for dramatic impact. Graendal seems like a boring, easy way out to me, and I can't think of a situation where revealing that it was her is in any way important.

I think the idea that Graendal is an obvious choice only works if you're coming from the point of view of a really big, analytic fan that actually spends hours and hours theorizing outside of the books. I've never gotten the impression that Sanderson fit that description.
This message last edited by lord-of-shadow on 14/11/2009 at 07:39:46 PM
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1175 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 620 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 727 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 736 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 573 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 542 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 548 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 464 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 417 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 445 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 592 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 541 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 449 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 519 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 639 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 531 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 511 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 223 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 209 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 607 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 730 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 213 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 197 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 450 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 521 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 208 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 556 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 580 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 570 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 450 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 596 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 511 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 489 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 543 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 470 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 426 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 704 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 207 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 199 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 455 Views

Reply to Message