Active Users:1096 Time:22/11/2024 06:15:52 PM
Based on those two actions... entyti Send a noteboard - 13/11/2009 08:01:32 PM
... then Egwene definitely commits the higher atrocity. Aes Sedai slaves of the Seanchan wouldn't add any more numbers to their military might (due to the Three Oaths). The only advantage is the knowledge of Traveling. If you think about it, this was an inevitability, since Elaida positioned herself at the top of the Tower, where the Seanchan raid originated. Egwene should have deduced this, imho.

Her actions were motivated by her own opinion of being on the bad end of forced slavery. Better to be dead than that. Though many of the Aes Sedai may have chosen this option, it was made for them, and Egwene isn't much better than the Seanchan for this choice. As it could have been, those Aes Sedai might have been negotiated out of their bondage at a later time. Now, they're just dead.

Her actions were very rash, especially when considering the fact that she had a Dream of needing the Seanchan for salvation right after the one about the Tower attack. This should have given her enough insight to at least understand that she is dealing with a misguided people who are not evil and can therefore be negotiated with.

However, Rand still takes the cake in this book. Not for your example, but for abandoning the people of Bandar Eban to starvation. That was a hard scene to take in, and I think it was a much darker choice for Rand than balefiring a bunch of overCompulsed sex slaves.
Omnipresent Lurker of WoTMB
Proud and Open Rolan Sympathiser
Fan of Everything Tool
Eternal Shiva Enthusiast
Reply to message
Who performs the worst atrocity in this book: Egwene or Rand? (A good Cannoli question) - 13/11/2009 06:22:50 PM 2078 Views
Egwene also killed Aes Sedai who belonged to the shadow by the dozens - 13/11/2009 07:19:14 PM 788 Views
Re: Egwene also killed Aes Sedai who belonged to the shadow by the dozens - 13/11/2009 07:25:14 PM 731 Views
Forcible turning is not the only method - 13/11/2009 08:28:08 PM 821 Views
But... - 13/11/2009 08:43:53 PM 867 Views
The point is - 13/11/2009 11:00:58 PM 595 Views
They were tried. *NM* - 14/11/2009 12:23:45 AM 301 Views
Mock trials - 14/11/2009 08:06:14 AM 693 Views
Proof? - 14/11/2009 09:09:14 AM 617 Views
That's the impression I got from Sheriam's 'trial' - 14/11/2009 09:44:09 AM 695 Views
But... - 14/11/2009 06:55:54 PM 665 Views
And if Verin had been caught, she would have deserved death. - 13/11/2009 11:55:13 PM 777 Views
Ordinarily, I would disagree... - 14/11/2009 04:20:28 AM 818 Views
Re: Ordinarily, I would disagree... - 14/11/2009 08:04:37 AM 732 Views
They had trials. No mention of them presenting such evidence. *NM* - 13/11/2009 11:54:23 PM 311 Views
Forced turnings should be killed too - 15/11/2009 07:06:43 AM 644 Views
Sad but true - 07/12/2009 05:05:08 PM 615 Views
Based on those two actions... - 13/11/2009 08:01:32 PM 795 Views
How was she going to protect the Tower and occupants then? - 13/11/2009 08:02:31 PM 711 Views
There is a difference between collateral damage and targeting your own people! *NM* - 13/11/2009 11:56:10 PM 333 Views
She did not target her own people... - 14/11/2009 12:39:14 AM 686 Views
You seem to be contradicting yourself here - 14/11/2009 07:52:07 AM 710 Views
Because they were indistinct specks high in the sky? *NM* - 14/11/2009 09:11:15 AM 313 Views
Considering the power she had in her hands - 14/11/2009 09:52:10 AM 1004 Views
That's ridiculous... - 14/11/2009 07:07:11 PM 708 Views
Re: That's ridiculous... - 14/11/2009 07:21:44 PM 685 Views
typical cannoli double speak, she wasn't targeting her own people - 14/11/2009 01:46:10 AM 2277 Views
Nothing wrong with that. - 14/11/2009 08:11:15 AM 740 Views
She does have first hand experience - 14/11/2009 07:52:20 PM 740 Views
Dozens of dark sisters together...trapped like rats... - 18/11/2009 12:29:19 AM 657 Views
Neither is an atrocity... - 13/11/2009 08:17:08 PM 937 Views
this ^ *NM* - 13/11/2009 08:34:10 PM 276 Views
Re: Neither is an atrocity... - 13/11/2009 08:59:30 PM 740 Views
Bull Sh!t! - 13/11/2009 09:08:00 PM 765 Views
Come on now... - 13/11/2009 09:13:50 PM 669 Views
Not outraged on their behalf... - 13/11/2009 09:26:11 PM 675 Views
Re: Not outraged on their behalf... - 13/11/2009 09:56:01 PM 598 Views
Re: Not outraged on their behalf... - 13/11/2009 10:08:06 PM 629 Views
Re: Not outraged on their behalf... - 13/11/2009 10:37:04 PM 691 Views
- 13/11/2009 10:45:57 PM 613 Views
Re: - 13/11/2009 11:16:58 PM 669 Views
Re: - 14/11/2009 12:34:49 AM 565 Views
Re: - 14/11/2009 01:46:51 AM 681 Views
Yes your argument is very much Bull Sh!t - 13/11/2009 09:15:17 PM 744 Views
So... - 13/11/2009 09:27:11 PM 695 Views
Re: So... - 13/11/2009 10:07:15 PM 590 Views
Not at all... - 13/11/2009 10:09:43 PM 622 Views
Re: Not at all... - 13/11/2009 10:54:14 PM 598 Views
Re: Not at all... - 14/11/2009 12:36:36 AM 609 Views
Break out the inflatable balloon swords and have at it already! - 14/11/2009 02:14:47 AM 639 Views
Rand. - 13/11/2009 09:17:14 PM 761 Views
Re: Rand. - 13/11/2009 10:56:04 PM 757 Views
But that is not her choice to make. She has NO right to decide that for anyone. *NM* - 13/11/2009 11:57:03 PM 324 Views
No, she had no right to make that choice - 14/11/2009 03:54:35 AM 591 Views
Yes, it was her choice to make, and she is now responsible for the consequences. - 16/11/2009 06:24:46 PM 1024 Views
Its the difference between - 14/11/2009 02:59:42 AM 653 Views
Cannoli mentioned already - after balefire you can live again - 20/11/2009 03:38:06 AM 576 Views

Reply to Message