Active Users:1153 Time:23/11/2024 01:30:38 AM
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM
I approve. =) I still think my comments made more sense than you gave them credit, but I accept your argument as better logic than mine. Well done... I think we can safely lay Asmodean reincarnation/reappearance aside as a possibility.


Absolutely your comments made sense and I apologize if I implied otherwise. I just wanted to show that the math eliminated the possibility no matter how strong the Choeden Kal was because of the number of people. Actually, since many of us are new Brandon Sanderson readers, it is a good idea to parse his words because we DON'T know if he is one of those authors who likes to play Aes Sedai.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1656 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 634 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 702 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 335 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 613 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 643 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 752 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 700 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 655 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 565 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 553 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 572 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 580 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 573 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 531 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 614 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 565 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 581 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 558 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 535 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 599 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 572 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 569 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 656 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 639 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 611 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 496 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 570 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 614 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 486 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 485 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 531 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 592 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 308 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 619 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 298 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 508 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 555 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 283 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 555 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 501 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 586 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 543 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 541 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 262 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 241 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 544 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 538 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 497 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 523 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 287 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 506 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 237 Views

Reply to Message